Michard Frédéric, Alaya Sami, Zarka Véronique, Bahloul Mabrouk, Richard Christian, Teboul Jean-Louis
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Bicêtre Hospital, University Paris XI, France.
Chest. 2003 Nov;124(5):1900-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.5.1900.
To assess the value of the global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) evaluated by transpulmonary thermodilution as an indicator of cardiac preload.
Prospective clinical study.
Medical ICU of a university hospital (20 beds).
Thirty-six patients with septic shock.
Volume loading and dobutamine infusion.
Hemodynamic parameters were evaluated in triplicate by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique: (1) before and after 66 fluid challenges in 27 patients, and (2) before and after 28 increases in dobutamine infusion rate in 9 patients. Volume loading induced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in central venous pressure (CVP) from 10 +/- 4 to 13 +/- 4 mm Hg, in GEDV index from 711 +/- 164 to 769 +/- 144 mL/m(2), in stroke volume index (SVI) from 36 +/- 12 to 42 +/- 12 mL/m(2), and in cardiac index (CI) from 3.4 +/- 1.1 to 3.9 +/- 1.2 L/min/m(2) (mean +/- SD). Changes in GEDV index were correlated (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) with changes in SVI, while changes in CVP were not. The increase in SVI was > 15% in 32 of 66 instances (positive response). The preinfusion GEDV index was lower (637 +/- 134 mL/m(2) vs 781 +/- 161 mL/m(2), p < 0.001) in the cases of positive response, and was negatively correlated with the percentage increase in GEDV index (r = - 0.65, p < 0.001) and in SVI (r = - 0.5, p < 0.001). Dobutamine infusion induced an increase in SVI (32 +/- 11 mL/m(2) vs 35 +/- 12 mL/m(2), p < 0.05) and in CI (2.8 +/- 0.6 L/min/m(2) vs 3.2 +/- 0.6 L/min/m(2), p < 0.001) but no significant change in CVP (13 +/- 3 mm Hg vs 13 +/- 3 mm Hg) and in GEDV index (823 +/- 221 mL/m(2) vs 817 +/- 202 mL/m(2)).
In patients with septic shock, our findings demonstrate that, in contrast to CVP, the transpulmonary thermodilution GEDV index behaves as an indicator of cardiac preload.
评估经肺热稀释法测得的全心舒张末期容积(GEDV)作为心脏前负荷指标的价值。
前瞻性临床研究。
一所大学医院的医学重症监护病房(20张床位)。
36例感染性休克患者。
容量负荷和多巴酚丁胺输注。
采用经肺热稀释技术对血流动力学参数进行三次评估:(1)27例患者在66次液体冲击前后,(2)9例患者在28次多巴酚丁胺输注速率增加前后。容量负荷使中心静脉压(CVP)从10±4显著升高至13±4 mmHg(p<0.001),GEDV指数从711±164升高至769±144 mL/m²,每搏量指数(SVI)从36±12升高至42±12 mL/m²,心脏指数(CI)从3.4±1.1升高至3.9±1.2 L/min/m²(均数±标准差)。GEDV指数变化与SVI变化相关(r = 0.72,p<0.001),而CVP变化与之无关。66例中有32例SVI升高>15%(阳性反应)。阳性反应病例中,输注前GEDV指数较低(637±134 mL/m² 对781±161 mL/m²,p<0.001),且与GEDV指数升高百分比(r = - 0.65,p<0.001)和SVI升高百分比(r = - 0.5,p<0.001)呈负相关。多巴酚丁胺输注使SVI升高(32±11 mL/m² 对35±12 mL/m²,p<0.05),CI升高(2.8±0.6 L/min/m² 对3.2±0.6 L/min/m²,p<0.001),但CVP无显著变化(13±3 mmHg对13±3 mmHg),GEDV指数也无显著变化(823±221 mL/m² 对817±202 mL/m²)。
在感染性休克患者中,我们的研究结果表明,与CVP不同,经肺热稀释法测得的GEDV指数可作为心脏前负荷的指标。