• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左西孟旦对感染性休克患者血流动力学及心功能的影响

[Effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with septic shock].

作者信息

Fang Mingxing, Dong Shimin

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, China, Corresponding author: Dong Shimin, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Oct;26(10):692-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.002.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.002
PMID:25315937
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A prospective single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted. The patients with septic shock admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from June 2011 to October 2013 were enrolled. The patients with septic shock received the conventional treatment according to international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-six patients received the examination of echocardiography and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤ 0.45 after fluid resuscitation were enrolled the study, who were divided into two groups according to random number table, with 18 cases in each group. After the conventional treatment, the patients in dobutamine group received intravenous injection of 5 μg × kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ dobutamine for 48 hours immediately after fluid resuscitation, and those in levosimendan group received a 24-hour infusion of 5 μg × kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ dobutamine followed by a 24-hour infusion of 0.2 μg × kg⁻¹ × min⁻¹ levosimendan. The hemodynamics and cardiac function were evaluated by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) and ultrasound during treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with dobutamine group, after the treatment in the levosimendan group, stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) were significantly increased [SVI (mL/m²): 39.8 ± 5.4 vs. 37.5 ± 4.5, t=-2.762, P=0.020; CI (L × min⁻¹ × m⁻²): 4.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, t=-9.829, P=0.000; LVSWI (kg ×min⁻ ¹ m⁻²): 33.7 ± 2.4 vs. 28.2 ± 1.2, t=-6.307, P=0.000], and central venous pressure (CVP), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) were significantly decreased [CVP (mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa): 8.2 ± 0.9 vs. 12.1 ± 0.8, t=3.928, P=0.002; ITBVI (mL/m²): 820 ± 42 vs. 978 ± 69, t=9.472, P=0.000; EVLWI (mL/kg): 6.1 ± 1.6 vs. 8.9 ± 1.7, t=4.467, P=0.001]. Cardiac ultrasound showed that compared with dobutamine group, in the levosimendan group, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESI) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDI) were significantly lowered [LVESI (mL/m²): 32.7 ± 9.2 vs. 48.2 ± 13.4, t=0.882, P=0.000; LVEDI (mL/m²): 61.7 ± 11.4 vs. 78.6 ± 13.6, t=2.453, P=0.032], and the LVEF was significantly increased (0.463 ± 0.068 vs. 0.383 ± .085, t=-2.439, P=0.035). Levosimendan also could decrease the lactic acid (mmol/L: 3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.2 ± 1.2, t=3.346, P=0.007), and increase the lactate clearance rate (mL/min: 73.2 ± 13.5 vs. 47.6 ± 11.8, t=-4.079, P=0.002), 24-hour urinary output (mL: 2 213.4 ± 354.0 vs. 1 533.8 ± 402.0, t=6.342, P=0.000) and 24-hour cumulative intake (mL: 5 746.6 ± 420.0 vs. 4 156.7 ± 215.0, t=7.126, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in total volume of norepinephrine,mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Levosimendan can increase cardiac ejection function, reduce the heart blood and vascular preload, intrathoracic lung water, improve heart function and systemic hemodynamic indexes of patients with septic shock.

摘要

目的

评估左西孟旦对感染性休克患者血流动力学及心功能的影响。

方法

进行一项前瞻性单中心随机对照试验。选取2011年6月至2013年10月在河北医科大学第三医院重症医学科住院的感染性休克患者。感染性休克患者按照国际严重脓毒症及感染性休克治疗指南接受常规治疗。对36例液体复苏后行超声心动图检查且左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤0.45的患者,根据随机数字表分为两组,每组18例。常规治疗后,多巴酚丁胺组患者在液体复苏后立即静脉注射5μg×kg⁻¹ min⁻¹多巴酚丁胺48小时,左西孟旦组患者先静脉输注5μg×kg⁻¹ min⁻¹多巴酚丁胺24小时,随后静脉输注0.2μg×kg⁻¹×min⁻¹左西孟旦24小时。治疗期间采用脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)和超声评估血流动力学及心功能。

结果

与多巴酚丁胺组相比,左西孟旦组治疗后,每搏量指数(SVI)、心脏指数(CI)和左心室每搏功指数(LVSWI)显著升高[SVI(mL/m²):39.8±5.4比37.5±4.5,t=-2.762,P=0.020;CI(L×min⁻¹×m⁻²):4.6±0.7比3.6±0.7,t=-9.829,P=0.000;LVSWI(kg×min⁻¹ m⁻²):33.7±2.4比28.2±1.2,t=-6.307,P=0.000],中心静脉压(CVP)、胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI)和血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)显著降低[CVP(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):8.2±0.9比12.1±0.8,t=3.928,P=0.002;ITBVI(mL/m²):820±42比978±69,t=9.472,P=0.000;EVLWI(mL/kg):6.1±1.6比8.9±1.7,t=4.467,P=0.001]。心脏超声显示,与多巴酚丁胺组相比,左西孟旦组左心室收缩末期容积(LVESI)和舒张末期容积(LVEDI)显著降低[LVESI(mL/m²):32.7±9.2比48.2±13.4,t=0.882,P=0.000;LVEDI(mL/m²):61.7±11.4比78.6±13.6,t=2.453,P=0.032],且LVEF显著升高(0.463±0.068比0.383±0.085,t=-2.439,P=0.035)。左西孟旦还可降低乳酸(mmol/L:3.4±1.1比5.2±1.2,t=3.346,P=0.007),提高乳酸清除率(mL/min:73.2±13.5比47.6±11.8,t=-4.079,P=0.002)、24小时尿量(mL:2 213.4±354.0比1 533.8±402.0,t=6.342,P=0.000)及24小时累计入量(mL:5 746.6±420.0比4 156.7±215.0,t=7.126,P=0.000)。两组去甲肾上腺素总量、重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率及28天死亡率差异无统计学意义。

结论

左西孟旦可增加感染性休克患者心脏射血功能,降低心脏前后负荷、胸腔内肺水,改善心功能及全身血流动力学指标。

相似文献

1
[Effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with septic shock].左西孟旦对感染性休克患者血流动力学及心功能的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Oct;26(10):692-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.002.
2
[Effect of esmolol on fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic parameters in patients with septic shock].艾司洛尔对感染性休克患者液体反应性及血流动力学参数的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):885-9.
3
Levosimendan Versus Dobutamine in Myocardial Injury Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.左西孟旦与多巴酚丁胺治疗感染性休克心肌损伤患者的随机对照试验
Med Sci Monit. 2016 May 3;22:1486-96. doi: 10.12659/msm.898457.
4
[The effects of levosimendan on the cardiac function and prognosis in elderly patients with septic shock and myocardial contractility impairment].[左西孟旦对老年感染性休克合并心肌收缩功能障碍患者心功能及预后的影响]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 1;57(6):423-428. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2018.06.006.
5
[Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients: a prospective study].[脉搏指示连续心输出量监测在脓毒症休克患者心功能评估中的价值:一项前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):22-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.006.
6
[Assessment of fluid volume in critically ill patients with extravascular lung water index].[血管外肺水指数对危重症患者液体容量的评估]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):33-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.008.
7
[Comparison of effect of norepinephrine and terlipressin on patients with ARDS combined with septic shock: a prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial].去甲肾上腺素与特利加压素对急性呼吸窘迫综合征合并感染性休克患者疗效的比较:一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):111-116. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.004.
8
[Effects of the β-blockers on cardiac protection and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock: a prospective study].[β受体阻滞剂对感染性休克患者心脏保护及血流动力学的影响:一项前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Oct;26(10):714-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.007.
9
Inotropic support during experimental endotoxemic shock: part II. A comparison of levosimendan with dobutamine.实验性内毒素血症休克期间的正性肌力支持:第二部分。左西孟旦与多巴酚丁胺的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1576-83. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af40e0. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
10
[Early predictive value of hemodynamic parameters during fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis shock].[脓毒症休克患者液体复苏期间血流动力学参数的早期预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):43-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Levosimendan vs. Dobutamine in Patients with Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.左西孟旦与多巴酚丁胺用于感染性休克患者的疗效比较:一项采用序贯试验分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 5;14(15):5496. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155496.
2
Levosimendan for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: friend or foe?左西孟旦治疗脓毒症诱发的心肌功能障碍:是福是祸?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 8;11:1520596. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1520596. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
左西孟旦在脓毒症患者中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 8;15:1358735. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1358735. eCollection 2024.
4
Effect of levosimendan on ventricular remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a meta-analysis.左西孟旦对左心室收缩功能障碍患者心室重构的影响:一项荟萃分析。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;11(3):1352-1376. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14714. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
Perioperative Application of Levosimendan Optimizes Postoperative Renal Function and Organ Perfusion in Patients with Severe Heart Failure.左西孟旦围手术期应用可优化重度心力衰竭患者术后肾功能及器官灌注
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jul 20;10(7):312. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070312.
6
Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左西孟旦与多巴酚丁胺治疗脓毒症性心功能障碍的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99716-9.
7
Combination era, using combined vasopressors showed benefits in treating septic shock patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.联合治疗时代,使用联合血管升压药对治疗感染性休克患者有益:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(20):535. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.134.
8
Multiorgan Drug Action of Levosimendan in Critical Illnesses.左西孟旦在危重病中的多器官药物作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Sep 19;2019:9731467. doi: 10.1155/2019/9731467. eCollection 2019.
9
Levosimendan does not reduce the mortality of critically ill adult patients with sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis.左西孟旦并未降低脓毒症和脓毒性休克危重症成年患者的死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 May 20;132(10):1212-1217. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000197.
10
Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较血管活性药物在感染性休克患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 14;23(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2427-4.