Alapati Satish B, Brantley William A, Svec Timothy A, Powers John M, Mitchell John C
Dental Materials Science Program, Prosthodontics and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus 4328-2357, USA.
J Endod. 2003 Oct;29(10):667-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00014.
The appearances of the tip sections of ProFile 0.04 taper and Lightspeed 25-mm long, ISO size 25, nickel-titanium rotary instruments were compared with a scanning electron microscope in the as-received condition and after one, three, and six simulated clinical uses to prepare mesial canals of extracted mandibular molars. For the used ProFile instruments, there was some flattening of the characteristic material rollover and minor apparent wear at the edges of the flutes, but there was little change in the tip regions of the used Lightspeed instruments. Deposits on the surfaces of the instruments were attributed to the manufacturing processes and the in vitro preparation of root canals in the extracted teeth. The simulated clinical use did not cause substantial changes in the regions of these two brands of rotary instruments that are involved in the clinical preparation of root canals.
将ProFile 0.04锥度、25毫米长、ISO尺寸25的镍钛旋转器械以及Lightspeed旋转器械的尖端部分在收到时的状态以及在模拟临床使用1次、3次和6次以预备拔除的下颌磨牙近中根管后的状态,用扫描电子显微镜进行了比较。对于使用过的ProFile器械,特征性的材料翻转有一些变平,且凹槽边缘有轻微的明显磨损,但使用过的Lightspeed器械的尖端区域几乎没有变化。器械表面的沉积物归因于制造工艺以及在拔除牙齿中进行根管的体外预备。模拟临床使用并未在这两个品牌旋转器械参与根管临床预备的区域引起实质性变化。