Bottini G, Toraldo A
Sezione di Psicologia, Dipartimento di Filosofia, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Italy.
Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00091-5.
Neglect of contralesional stimuli and perseverative behavior on ipsilesional stimuli may co-occur on a target cancellation task. Our aim was to investigate whether the presence vs. absence of contralesional targets can modify perseveration on ipsilesional targets. We studied four right brain-damaged patients with left neglect and perseverative behavior on screening cancellation tasks. We compared their cancellation performance in two conditions: (i) targets equally distributed on both sides of space and (ii) targets confined to the right side. One patient showed no significant difference in perseveration between these two conditions; in contrast, three patients perseverated significantly more in condition (i) than in condition (ii). These results suggest that, at least in some patients, information from the 'neglected' targets is not completely lost, but rather it affects behavior in the ipsilesional side. The traditional dichotomy 'bad space-good space' would not apply here.
在目标删除任务中,对健侧刺激的忽视和对患侧刺激的持续性行为可能同时出现。我们的目的是研究健侧目标的存在与否是否会改变对患侧目标的持续性行为。我们研究了四名右脑损伤且在筛选删除任务中存在左侧忽视和持续性行为的患者。我们比较了他们在两种情况下的删除表现:(i)目标在空间两侧均匀分布;(ii)目标局限于右侧。一名患者在这两种情况下的持续性行为没有显著差异;相反,三名患者在情况(i)中的持续性行为明显多于情况(ii)。这些结果表明,至少在一些患者中,来自“被忽视”目标的信息并没有完全丢失,而是会影响患侧的行为。传统的“坏空间-好空间”二分法在此处并不适用。