Psychology Department and Neuroscience Institute of Turin (NIT), University of Turin, Italy.
J Neuropsychol. 2013 Mar;7(1):45-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2012.02034.x. Epub 2012 May 30.
In cancellation tasks, patients with unilateral spatial neglect typically fail to mark targets within the side of the sheet contralateral to the side of the lesion (contralesional). Moreover, they can show a perseverative behaviour, which consists in repeatedly cancelling stimuli, mainly in the side of the display ipsilateral to the side of the lesion (ipsilesional). We investigated in 13 right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect and perseverative behaviour whether and how different densities of horizontal targets modulated omission and perseverative errors. We found that the density of targets modulated the patients' distribution of neglect (area of omission), but not its extent, as indexed by the percentage of omissions. Specifically, the area of omissions tightened when target density increased leftwards. On the other hand, target density did not affect the distribution of perseverative behaviour (area of perseveration), as well as its extent, as indexed by the percentage of perseverations. Correlation analyses showed that both the extent and the distribution of omissions were positively correlated to clinical measures of spatial neglect. Conversely, perseverations did not show such a correlation. These findings support the view that two different pathological mechanisms might be involved in left spatial neglect and in ipsilesional perseverative behaviour.
在取消任务中,单侧空间忽略症患者通常无法标记与病变侧相对应的纸张侧内的目标(对侧忽略)。此外,他们可能会表现出一种持续行为,即反复取消刺激,主要是在与病变侧相对应的显示侧(同侧忽略)。我们研究了 13 名右脑损伤、左侧空间忽略和持续行为的患者,以确定不同密度的水平目标是否以及如何调节遗漏和持续错误。我们发现,目标密度调节了患者的忽略分布(遗漏区域),但不能调节其范围,这可以通过遗漏百分比来衡量。具体来说,当目标密度向左增加时,遗漏区域会收紧。另一方面,目标密度不会影响持续行为的分布(持续区域)及其范围,这可以通过持续百分比来衡量。相关分析表明,遗漏的范围和分布均与空间忽略的临床测量呈正相关。相反,持续行为没有显示出这种相关性。这些发现支持这样一种观点,即两种不同的病理机制可能涉及左侧空间忽略和同侧持续行为。