Samartzis Dino, Shen Francis H, Matthews Don K, Yoon S Tim, Goldberg Edward J, An Howard S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Spine J. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):451-9. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00173-6.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A relatively high pseudarthrosis rate is associated with multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Anterior plate fixation increases fusion rate in multilevel ACDF. A debate still exists between the effectiveness of allograft versus autograft in plated multilevel ACDF. PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of allograft versus autograft in fusion rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing two- and three-level ACDFs with rigid anterior plate fixation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective radiographic and clinical review to assess fusion, risk factors and clinical outcome of 80 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with rigid anterior plate fixation involving two and three levels with either allograft or autograft. PATIENT SAMPLE: There were 45 patients (56%) who had autogenous iliac crest tricortical grafts and 35 patients (44%) who received tricortical allograft with an average age of 49 years who were treated by multilevel ACDF with rigid anterior plate fixation at a single institution. Thirty-three Peak polyaxial (Depuy-Acromed, Rayham, MA), 26 Orion (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN), 16 Atlantis (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN) and 5 Synthes (Paoli, PA) anterior cervical plating systems were used. All patients underwent ACDF (61 two-level, 19 three-level) by a Smith Robinson technique. All patients had burring of the end plates, 2-mm distraction of the motion segment and graft countersunk 2 mm from the anterior vertebral border. Anterior cervical plate with unicortical screw purchase was used in all cases. Segmental screw fixation was performed in 46 patients. Soft collars were worn postoperatively for 3 to 4 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Follow-up lateral neutral, flexion and extension radiographs were used to assess fusion. The radiographs were reviewed by an independent blinded observer in assessing fusion grades between autograft versus allograft. Clinical outcomes were rated excellent, good, fair and poor based on Odom's criteria. METHODS: Fusion rate and postoperative clinical outcome were assessed in 80 patients who underwent two- or three-level ACDF with rigid anterior plate fixation. Additional risk factors were also analyzed. RESULTS: Radiographic fusion was assessed in all patients (mean, 16 months). Seventy-eight patients (97.5%) achieved solid arthrodesis. Pseudarthrosis occurred in two patients who had allograft for two-level and three-level fusions. Nonsegmental screws were used in the two-level nonunion case. Postoperative dysphagia developed in one two-level nonunion patient, and revision surgery was performed in the other nonunion three-level patient. Twenty-three patients were smokers, and 26 patients had work-related injuries. Clinical outcome (mean, 20 months) was excellent in 23, good in 48 and fair in 9 patients. No statistical significance was noted between demographics, history of tobacco use, graft-type, end plate preparation technique, intermediate segmental screws, plate-type, clinical outcome of fused and nonfused patients and presence of work-related injuries (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: A high fusion rate of 97.5% was obtained for multilevel ACDF with rigid plating with either autograft or allograft. In this study, nonunion occurred in patients with allograft but this difference was not statistically significant. Fusion was obtained in 97.8% of patients with segmental screw fixation and 97.1% with nonsegmental screw fixation. Nonsegmental screw fixation may contribute to less than adequate stability and contribute to a higher rate of nonunion, but such effects could not be discerned from this study. Excellent and good clinical outcome was noted in 88.8% of the patients. Proper patient selection and meticulous operative technique is essential to obtain high fusion rates and optimal clinical outcome, which is more important than graft type.
背景:多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的假关节形成率相对较高。前路钢板固定可提高多节段ACDF的融合率。在采用钢板固定的多节段ACDF中,同种异体骨与自体骨的有效性仍存在争议。 目的:确定在接受两节段和三节段ACDF并采用坚固前路钢板固定的患者中,同种异体骨与自体骨在融合率和临床结果方面的疗效。 研究设计:一项回顾性影像学和临床研究,评估80例连续接受ACDF并采用坚固前路钢板固定的患者的融合情况、危险因素和临床结果,这些患者涉及两节段或三节段,使用了同种异体骨或自体骨。 患者样本:45例(56%)患者采用自体髂骨三皮质骨移植,35例(44%)患者接受三皮质同种异体骨移植,平均年龄49岁,均在单一机构接受多节段ACDF并采用坚固前路钢板固定。使用了33套Peak多轴(Depuy-Acromed,Rayham,马萨诸塞州)、26套Orion(Sofamor-Danek,孟菲斯,田纳西州)、16套Atlantis(Sofamor-Danek,孟菲斯,田纳西州)和5套Synthes(Paoli,宾夕法尼亚州)颈椎前路钢板系统。所有患者均采用Smith Robinson技术进行ACDF(61例为两节段,19例为三节段)。所有患者均进行了终板打磨,运动节段撑开2mm,移植骨从前椎体边缘下沉2mm。所有病例均使用单皮质螺钉固定的颈椎前路钢板。46例患者进行了节段性螺钉固定。术后佩戴软颈托3至4周。 观察指标:随访时的中立位、屈曲位和伸展位侧位X线片用于评估融合情况。由一名独立的盲法观察者对X线片进行评估,以比较自体骨与同种异体骨的融合等级。根据奥多姆标准将临床结果评为优、良、中、差。 方法:评估80例接受两节段或三节段ACDF并采用坚固前路钢板固定的患者的融合率和术后临床结果。还分析了其他危险因素。 结果:对所有患者(平均随访16个月)进行了影像学融合评估。78例患者(97.5%)实现了坚固融合。两名接受同种异体骨进行两节段和三节段融合的患者发生了假关节形成。两节段未融合病例使用了非节段性螺钉。一名两节段未融合患者出现了术后吞咽困难,另一名三节段未融合患者进行了翻修手术。23例患者为吸烟者,26例患者有工伤。临床结果(平均随访20个月):23例为优,48例为良,9例为中。在人口统计学、吸烟史、移植骨类型、终板准备技术、中间节段性螺钉、钢板类型、融合与未融合患者的临床结果以及工伤情况之间未发现统计学差异(p>0.05)。 结论:采用自体骨或同种异体骨并坚固钢板固定的多节段ACDF融合率高达97.5%。在本研究中,同种异体骨患者出现了未融合情况,但这种差异无统计学意义。节段性螺钉固定的患者融合率为97.8%,非节段性螺钉固定的患者融合率为97.1%。非节段性螺钉固定可能导致稳定性不足,进而导致未融合率较高,但本研究未能明确这种影响。88.8% 的患者临床结果为优或良。正确的患者选择和细致的手术技术对于获得高融合率和最佳临床结果至关重要,这比移植骨类型更重要。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009-8
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000-8-15