Suppr超能文献

术后硬膜外镇痛的疗效:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Block Brian M, Liu Spencer S, Rowlingson Andrew J, Cowan Anne R, Cowan John A, Wu Christopher L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md 21287, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral opioids for postoperative pain control remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia vs parenteral opioids, the primary alternative technique.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified primarily by searching the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to April 25, 2002) and other sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were a comparison of epidural therapy vs parenteral opioids for postoperative analgesia, measurement of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale, randomization of patients to either therapy, and adult patients (> or =18 years). A total of 1404 abstracts were identified, 100 of which met all inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Each article was reviewed and data extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures as needed. Weighted mean pain scores, weighted mean differences in pain score, and weighted incidences of complications were determined by using a fixed-effect model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Epidural analgesia provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids (mean [SE], 19.40 mm [0.17] vs 29.40 mm [0.20] on the VAS; P<.001). When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on each postoperative day (P<.001 for each day after surgery). For all types of surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioid analgesia (P<.001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thoracic surgery (weighted mean difference, 0.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 1.5 mm; P =.12). The complication rates were lower than expected for nausea or vomiting and pruritus but comparable with existing data for lower extremity motor block.

CONCLUSION

Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment, provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids.

摘要

背景

硬膜外镇痛是否比胃肠外给予阿片类药物更适合用于术后疼痛控制仍存在争议。

目的

系统评价术后硬膜外镇痛与胃肠外给予阿片类药物(主要的替代技术)的疗效。

资料来源

主要通过检索美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed数据库(1966年至2002年4月25日)以及其他与术后硬膜外镇痛相关的研究来源来确定研究。

研究选择

纳入标准为硬膜外治疗与胃肠外给予阿片类药物用于术后镇痛的比较、使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)或数字评定量表测量疼痛、患者随机接受两种治疗之一以及成年患者(≥18岁)。共识别出1404篇摘要,其中100篇符合所有纳入标准。

资料提取

对每篇文章进行审查,并根据需要从表格、文本中提取数据或从图表中推断数据。使用固定效应模型确定加权平均疼痛评分、疼痛评分的加权平均差异以及并发症的加权发生率。

资料综合

与胃肠外给予阿片类药物相比,硬膜外镇痛提供了更好的术后镇痛效果(VAS上的均值[标准误],19.40 mm [0.17] 对比29.40 mm [0.20];P<0.001)。按术后天数分析时,硬膜外镇痛在术后每一天都优于胃肠外给予阿片类药物(术后每一天P<0.001)。对于所有类型的手术和疼痛评估,除了胸段硬膜外镇痛与胸段手术后静息痛的阿片类药物比较外(加权平均差异,0.6 mm;95%置信区间,-0.3至1.5 mm;P = 0.12),所有形式的硬膜外镇痛与胃肠外阿片类药物镇痛相比均提供了显著更好的术后镇痛效果(所有P<0.001)。恶心或呕吐以及瘙痒的并发症发生率低于预期,但与下肢运动阻滞的现有数据相当。

结论

无论镇痛药物、导管置入位置以及疼痛评估的类型和时间如何,硬膜外镇痛与胃肠外给予阿片类药物相比都提供了更好的术后镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验