Baier Rosa R, Gifford David R, Lyder Courtney H, Schall Marie W, Funston-Dillon Diane L, Lewis Jennifer M, Ordin Diana L
Department of Community Health, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;4(6):291-301. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000094064.06058.74.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of a collaborative model of quality improvement in nursing homes on processes of care for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers.
The study design was experimental.
We studied 29 nursing homes in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.
Participants consisted of pressure ulcer quality improvement teams in 29 nursing homes.
Quality improvement teams attended a series of workshops to review clinical guidelines and quality improvement principles and to share best practices, and worked one-on-one with mentors to implement quality improvement techniques and to collect data independently.
We calculated process measures based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guidelines. Process measures addressed each facility's processes of care for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers at baseline and after 12 months of intervention. Prevention measures focused on recent admissions and high-risk residents; treatment measures focused on patients newly diagnosed with pressure ulcers and all patients with pressure ulcers.
Overall, 6 of 8 prevention process measures improved significantly, with percent difference between baseline and follow up ranging from 11.6% to 24.5%. Three of 4 treatment process measures improved significantly, with 5.0%, 8.9%, and 25.9% difference between baseline and follow up. For each process measure, between 5 and 12 facilities demonstrated significant improvement between baseline and follow up, and only 2 or fewer declined for each process measure.
Improvement in processes of care after the use of a structured collaborative quality improvement approach is possible in the nursing home setting.
本研究的目的是评估疗养院质量改进协作模式对压疮预防和治疗护理过程的影响。
研究设计为实验性。
我们对新泽西州、宾夕法尼亚州和罗德岛州的29家疗养院进行了研究。
参与者包括29家疗养院的压疮质量改进团队。
质量改进团队参加了一系列研讨会,以审查临床指南和质量改进原则并分享最佳实践,并与导师一对一合作实施质量改进技术并独立收集数据。
我们根据医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的指南计算过程指标。过程指标涉及每个机构在基线时以及干预12个月后的压疮预防和治疗护理过程。预防指标侧重于近期入院患者和高危居民;治疗指标侧重于新诊断为压疮的患者以及所有压疮患者。
总体而言,8项预防过程指标中有6项有显著改善,基线与随访之间的百分比差异在11.6%至24.5%之间。4项治疗过程指标中有3项有显著改善,基线与随访之间的差异分别为5.0%、8.9%和25.9%。对于每项过程指标,有5至12家机构在基线与随访之间表现出显著改善,每项过程指标仅有2家或更少的机构出现下降。
在疗养院环境中,采用结构化协作质量改进方法后护理过程有可能得到改善。