Colón-Emeric Cathleen S, Pinheiro Sandro O, Anderson Ruth A, Porter Kristie, McConnell Eleanor, Corazzini Kirsten, Hancock Kathryn, Lipscomb Jeffery, Beales Julie, Simpson Kelly M
*Address correspondence to Cathleen Colón-Emeric, MHS, Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, MD 508 Fulton St., GRECC 182, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail:
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):446-59. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt043. Epub 2013 May 23.
The CONNECT intervention is designed to improve staff connections, communication, and use of multiple perspectives for problem solving. This analysis compared staff descriptions of the learning climate, use of social constructivist learning processes, and outcomes in nursing facilities receiving CONNECT with facilities receiving a falls education program alone.
Qualitative evaluation of a randomized controlled trial was done using a focus group design. Facilities (n = 8) were randomized to a falls education program alone (control) or CONNECT followed by FALLS (intervention). A total of 77 staff participated in 16 focus groups using a structured interview protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using framework analysis, and summaries for each domain were compared between intervention and control facilities.
Notable differences in descriptions of the learning climate included greater learner empowerment, appreciation of the role of all disciplines, and seeking diverse viewpoints in the intervention group. Greater use of social constructivist learning processes was evidenced by the intervention group as they described greater identification of communication weaknesses, improvement in communication frequency and quality, and use of sense-making by seeking out multiple perspectives to better understand and act on information. Intervention group participants reported outcomes including more creative fall prevention plans, a more respectful work environment, and improved relationships with coworkers. No substantial difference between groups was identified in safety culture, shared responsibility, and self-reported knowledge about falls.
CONNECT appears to enhance the use of social constructivist learning processes among nursing home staff. The impact of CONNECT on clinical outcomes requires further study.
CONNECT干预旨在改善员工之间的联系、沟通,并促进运用多种观点解决问题。本分析比较了接受CONNECT干预的护理机构与仅接受跌倒教育计划的护理机构中员工对学习氛围的描述、社会建构主义学习过程的运用情况以及相关结果。
采用焦点小组设计对一项随机对照试验进行定性评估。将机构(n = 8)随机分为仅接受跌倒教育计划(对照组)或先接受CONNECT干预再接受跌倒教育计划(干预组)。共有77名员工参与了16个焦点小组,采用结构化访谈协议。使用框架分析法对访谈记录进行分析,并比较干预组和对照组机构在每个领域的总结情况。
在对学习氛围的描述方面,显著差异包括干预组中学习者赋权程度更高、对所有学科作用的认可度更高以及寻求不同观点。干预组更多地运用了社会建构主义学习过程,他们描述了更能识别沟通弱点、沟通频率和质量有所提高,以及通过寻求多种观点来更好地理解信息并据此采取行动的意义建构方式。干预组参与者报告的结果包括更具创造性的跌倒预防计划、更尊重人的工作环境以及与同事关系的改善。在安全文化、共同责任以及自我报告的跌倒知识方面,两组之间未发现实质性差异。
CONNECT似乎增强了养老院员工对社会建构主义学习过程的运用。CONNECT对临床结果的影响需要进一步研究。