Plagnol A, Oïta M, Montreuil M, Granger B, Lubart T
Service de Psychiatrie Adulte, CHU Necker, Université Paris 5.
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):401-11.
Existent neurocognitive models of schizophrenia converge towards a core of impairments involving working memory, context processing, action planning, controlled and intentional processing. However, the emergence of this core remains itself difficult to explain and more specific hypotheses do not explain the heterogeneity of schizophrenia. To overcome these limits, we propose a new paradigm based on representational theory from cognitive science. Some recent developments of this theory enable us to describe a subjective universe as a representational space which is displayed from memory. We outline a conceptual framework to construct such a representational space from analogical -representations that can be activated in working memory and are connected to a network of symbolic structures. These connections are notably made through an analytic process of the analogical fragments, which involves the attentional focus. This framework allows us to define rigorously some defense processes in response to traumatic tensions that are expressed on the representational space. The fragmentation of representational space is a consequence of a defensive denial based on an impairment of the analytic process. The fragmentation forms some parasitic areas in memory which are excluded from the main part of the representational space and disturb information processing. The key clinical concepts of paranoid syndromes can be defined in this conceptual framework: mental automatism, delusional intuition, acute destructuration, psychotic dissociation, and autistic withdrawal. We show that these syndromes imply each other, which in return increases the fragmentation of the representational space. Some new concepts emerge naturally in this framework, such as the concept of "suture" which is defined as a link between a parasitic area and the main representational space. Schizophrenia appears as a borderline case of fragmentation of the representational space. This conceptual framework is compatible with numerous etiological factors. Multiple clinical forms can be differentiated in accordance with the persistence of parasitic areas, the degree of fragmentation, and the formation of sutures. We use this approach to account for an empirical study concerning the analysis of analogical representations in schizophrenia. We used the Parallel Visual Information Processing Test (PVIPT) which assesses the analysis of interfering visual information. Subjects were asked to connect several small geometric figures printed on a transparency. The transparency was displayed above four photographs which were the interfering material. Then, subjects completed three tasks concerning the photographs: a recognition task, a recall task, and an affective qualification task. Using a case-by-case study, this test allows us to access the defense processes of the subjects, which is not possible with the usual methods in cognitive psychopathology. Twelve clinically-stable schizophrenic subjects participated in the study which also included a self-assessment of alexithymia by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. We obtained 2 main results: (a) creation of items in recall or false recognition by 8 subjects, and (b) lack of the usual -negative correlations between the alexithymia score and the recall, recognition and affective qualification scores in the PVIPT. These 2 results contrast with what has been previously observed for alexithymia using the same methodology. The result (a) confirms an interfering activation in schizophrenic memory, which can be interpreted in our framework as indicative of parasitic areas. The creation of items suggests the formation of sutures between the semantic content of photographs and some delusional fragments. The result (b) suggests that the apparent alexithymia in schizophrenia is a defense against interfering activation in parasitic areas. We underline the interest of individual protocols to exhibit the dynamic interplay between an interfering activity in memory and a defensive flattening of affects.
现有的精神分裂症神经认知模型趋向于一个涉及工作记忆、情境处理、行动规划、受控和有意处理的损伤核心。然而,这个核心的出现本身就难以解释,更具体的假设也无法解释精神分裂症的异质性。为了克服这些局限性,我们基于认知科学的表征理论提出了一种新的范式。该理论的一些最新进展使我们能够将主观世界描述为一个从记忆中呈现的表征空间。我们概述了一个概念框架,用于从类比表征构建这样一个表征空间,这些类比表征可以在工作记忆中被激活,并与一个符号结构网络相连。这些连接尤其通过类比片段的分析过程建立,这涉及注意力焦点。这个框架使我们能够严格定义一些应对在表征空间上表现出的创伤性紧张的防御过程。表征空间的碎片化是基于分析过程受损的防御性否认的结果。碎片化在记忆中形成一些寄生区域,这些区域被排除在表征空间的主要部分之外,并干扰信息处理。偏执综合征的关键临床概念可以在这个概念框架中定义:精神自动症、妄想直觉、急性解构、精神病性解离和自闭退缩。我们表明这些综合征相互暗示,这反过来又增加了表征空间的碎片化。一些新的概念在这个框架中自然出现,比如“缝合”的概念,它被定义为一个寄生区域与主要表征空间之间的联系。精神分裂症表现为表征空间碎片化的一种临界情况。这个概念框架与众多病因因素兼容。根据寄生区域的持续存在、碎片化程度和缝合的形成,可以区分多种临床形式。我们用这种方法来解释一项关于精神分裂症中类比表征分析的实证研究。我们使用了平行视觉信息处理测试(PVIPT),该测试评估对干扰视觉信息的分析。受试者被要求连接印在一张透明片上的几个小几何图形。透明片显示在四张照片上方,这四张照片是干扰材料。然后,受试者完成关于照片的三项任务:识别任务、回忆任务和情感评定任务。通过逐个案例研究,这个测试使我们能够了解受试者的防御过程,这是认知精神病理学中常用方法所无法做到的。12名临床稳定的精神分裂症患者参与了这项研究,该研究还包括通过多伦多述情障碍量表进行的述情障碍自我评估。我们得到了两个主要结果:(a)8名受试者在回忆或错误识别中产生项目,以及(b)在PVIPT中述情障碍得分与回忆、识别和情感评定得分之间缺乏通常的负相关。这两个结果与之前使用相同方法观察到的述情障碍情况形成对比。结果(a)证实了精神分裂症记忆中的干扰性激活,在我们的框架中这可以被解释为寄生区域的指示。项目的产生表明照片的语义内容与一些妄想片段之间形成了缝合。结果(b)表明精神分裂症中明显的述情障碍是对寄生区域干扰性激活的一种防御。我们强调个体方案对于展现记忆中的干扰活动与情感防御性扁平化之间动态相互作用的重要性。