O'Connell M J, Ryan M, Powell T, Eustace S
Department of Radiology, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital and Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Acta Radiol. 2003 Nov;44(6):665-72. doi: 10.1080/02841850312331287699.
To determine whether a commercially available automated MR myelogram sequence improves the interpretation and diagnostic yield at MRI of the lumbar spine.
A total of 207 consecutive patients referred for MR examination of the lumbar spine for evaluation of low back pain or spinal radicular symptoms were included for study. All patients had initial imaging with sagittal T1-W and T2-W scans, followed by axial T2-W images. Subsequently an MR myelogram was acquired in each case in coronal, sagittal and oblique planes. MR myelogram images were evaluated initially and a diagnosis was established and recorded. Subsequently, a diagnosis was established by review of conventional images of the lumbar spine in sagittal and axial planes, in conjunction with the MR myelogram. The utility of the MR myelogram in establishing the diagnosis was graded on a 4-point scale, where grade 0 indicated that it contributed no additional information and grade 3 indicated that it was essential for diagnosis. Analysis of the additional value of myelography in patients with multilevel disease was made.
Primary diagnoses were disc herniation in 69 cases (33%), degenerative disc disease in 51 cases (26%), spinal stenosis in 19 cases (9%), isolated lateral recess stenosis in 5 cases (2%), or other diagnoses, including facet degeneration in 48 cases (23%). Scans were normal in 15 cases (7%). MR myelography was graded as grade 0 in 151 cases (73%), grade 1 in 44 cases (21%) and grade 2 in 12 cases (6%). In no case was MR myelography essential for diagnosis (grade 3). In patients with multilevel disease (n=27), in 17 cases MR myelography was graded as grade 1 (63%) and in 8 cases grade 2 (30%).
MR myelography when employed in routine practice was of limited value, assisting in establishing a diagnosis in a minority of cases (6%). The technique was of limited additional value in patients with multilevel pathology and to a lesser extent in patients with scoliosis, where it helped to establish the level most likely to account for pathology.
确定一种市售的自动磁共振脊髓造影序列是否能提高腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)的解读及诊断率。
共纳入207例因腰背痛或神经根性症状而接受腰椎MR检查的连续患者进行研究。所有患者均先行矢状位T1加权和T2加权扫描,随后行轴位T2加权成像。之后,对每例患者在冠状位、矢状位和斜位平面获取磁共振脊髓造影图像。首先对磁共振脊髓造影图像进行评估,并确立和记录诊断结果。随后,结合磁共振脊髓造影,通过回顾腰椎矢状位和轴位的传统图像确立诊断。根据4分制对磁共振脊髓造影在确立诊断中的效用进行分级,其中0级表示未提供额外信息,3级表示对诊断至关重要。分析了脊髓造影在多节段病变患者中的附加价值。
初步诊断为椎间盘突出69例(33%)、椎间盘退变51例(26%)、椎管狭窄19例(9%)、孤立性侧隐窝狭窄5例(2%)或其他诊断,包括小关节退变48例(23%)。扫描结果正常15例(7%)。磁共振脊髓造影分级为0级151例(73%)、1级44例(21%)、2级12例(6%)。在任何病例中,磁共振脊髓造影对诊断均非必不可少(3级)。在多节段病变患者(n = 27)中,17例磁共振脊髓造影分级为1级(63%),8例分级为2级(30%)。
在常规实践中应用磁共振脊髓造影价值有限,仅在少数病例(6%)中有助于确立诊断。该技术在多节段病变患者中的附加价值有限,在脊柱侧弯患者中的附加价值较小,但其有助于确定最可能导致病变的节段。