Evans A S, Khan A M, Young D, Adamson R
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, The Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Dec;28(6):489-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00763.x.
Many previous studies have considered patient re-admission rates alone as the true rate of secondary haemorrhage following adult tonsillectomy. We aimed to determine the true rate of secondary haemorrhage following tonsillectomy in adults by performing a telephone interview with 60 consecutive patients. Whilst 40% (n = 24) of our patients reported a significant episode of bleeding (blood actively flowing from their mouth for more than 1 min) following discharge, only 8% (n = 5) were re-admitted and only 3% (n = 2) required return to theatre. Review of the current literature suggests that return-to-theatre rates are more consistent than hospital re-admission rates in large studies. We would suggest that although secondary haemorrhage can occasionally be very serious, the majority is minor, and it would therefore be more useful when comparing different techniques for tonsillectomy to consider numbers of patients returning to theatre rather than re-admission rates.
许多先前的研究仅将患者再入院率视为成人扁桃体切除术后继发性出血的真实发生率。我们旨在通过对60例连续患者进行电话访谈来确定成人扁桃体切除术后继发性出血的真实发生率。虽然我们40%(n = 24)的患者报告出院后有明显的出血情况(血液从口腔中持续流出超过1分钟),但只有8%(n = 5)的患者再次入院,只有3%(n = 2)的患者需要返回手术室。对当前文献的回顾表明,在大型研究中,返回手术室的发生率比医院再入院率更具一致性。我们认为,虽然继发性出血偶尔可能非常严重,但大多数情况较轻,因此在比较不同的扁桃体切除技术时,考虑返回手术室的患者数量而非再入院率会更有用。