Suppr超能文献

扁桃体出血与再入院:一项基于问卷调查的研究。

Tonsilar haemorrhage and re-admission: a questionnaire based study.

机构信息

Department of General Otorhinolaryngology, Head- and Neck Surgery, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 26-28, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Dec;268(12):1803-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1541-y. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy of haemorrhage rate in the community (i.e., actual rate versus hospital recorded rate) for tonsil operations. Bleeding episodes were investigated for 695 consecutive patients undergoing tonsillectomy, adenotonsillectomy and tonsillotomy at the Department of ORL, H&NS, MU of Graz, Austria, between January 1 2007 and June 30 2008 by questionnaire. Main purposes of our study were the evaluation of the incidence of postoperative haemorrhage, need for revision surgery, medical care of patients experiencing postoperative bleeding and multiple bleeding episodes. Haemorrhage was defined as any bleeding, be it minimal or significant, after extubation. The study group comprised 407 patients who answered the questionnaire: 61.7% adults, 22.1% school children between 6 and 15 years and 16.2% children aged less than 6 years. Exactly 100 patients (24.6% of 407) showed some kind of postoperative bleeding, but only 79 of them (19.4% of 407) were recorded at hospital. A return to theatre due to haemorrhage was required in 4.7% of all 407 cases. Combining hospital records and data from the questionnaire allowed us to estimate an overall haemorrhage rate of 21.4% for all 695 patients. Every fifth patient experiencing postoperative haemorrhage did not return to the hospital he or she was operated in. We would have missed 21.0% of all bleeding episodes by assessing re-admitting patients suffering postoperative bleeding only. We conclude that haemorrhage rate is considerably higher than assumed by investigating hospital records only and strongly related to the definition of postoperative bleeding and to the study design.

摘要

我们的研究目的是调查社区(即实际发生率与医院记录率)扁桃体手术出血率的准确性。2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 6 月 30 日,在奥地利格拉茨 MU 的耳鼻喉科、头颈外科和神经外科部门,通过问卷调查对 695 例连续行扁桃体切除术、腺样体切除术和扁桃体切开术的患者的出血事件进行了调查。我们研究的主要目的是评估术后出血的发生率、需要进行修正手术的情况、接受术后出血治疗的患者的医疗护理以及多次出血事件。出血定义为拔管后出现的任何出血,无论是轻微还是明显。研究组包括 407 例回答问卷的患者:61.7%为成年人,22.1%为 6-15 岁的学龄儿童,16.2%为 6 岁以下儿童。确切地说,有 100 例患者(407 例的 24.6%)出现了某种术后出血,但只有 79 例(407 例的 19.4%)在医院记录。所有 407 例中有 4.7%因出血而需要返回手术室。将医院记录和问卷数据结合起来,我们可以估计所有 695 例患者的总体出血率为 21.4%。每 5 例经历术后出血的患者中,就有 1 例未返回手术医院。如果仅评估因术后出血而再次入院的患者,我们将错过所有出血事件的 21.0%。我们的结论是,出血率明显高于仅通过调查医院记录所假设的出血率,且与术后出血的定义以及研究设计密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验