Suppr超能文献

用于乳腺癌诊断的多激发荧光光谱法与漫反射光谱法的比较(2003年3月)

Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

作者信息

Palmer Gregory M, Zhu Changfang, Breslin Tara M, Xu Fushen, Gilchrist Kennedy W, Ramanujam Nirmala

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Nov;50(11):1233-42. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.818488.

Abstract

Nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 20) tissue samples were obtained from breast cancer and breast reduction surgeries. These tissues were characterized using multiple excitation wavelength fluorescence spectroscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible wavelength range, immediately after excision. Spectra were then analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) as a data reduction technique. PCA was performed on each fluorescence spectrum, as well as on the diffuse reflectance spectrum individually, to establish a set of principal components for each spectrum. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which principal components show statistically significant differences between malignant and nonmalignant tissues. Finally, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was utilized to classify the samples based on the diagnostically useful principal components. Cross-validation of this nonparametric algorithm was carried out to determine its classification accuracy in an unbiased manner. Multiexcitation fluorescence spectroscopy was successful in discriminating malignant and nonmalignant tissues, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 92%, respectively. The sensitivity (30%) and specificity (78%) of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy alone was significantly lower. Combining fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra did not improve the classification accuracy of an algorithm based on fluorescence spectra alone. The fluorescence excitation-emission wavelengths identified as being diagnostic from the PCA-SVM algorithm suggest that the important fluorophores for breast cancer diagnosis are most likely tryptophan, NAD(P)H and flavoproteins.

摘要

从乳腺癌手术和乳房缩小手术中获取了非恶性(n = 36)和恶性(n = 20)组织样本。这些组织在切除后立即在紫外 - 可见波长范围内使用多激发波长荧光光谱和漫反射光谱进行表征。然后使用主成分分析(PCA)作为数据降维技术对光谱进行分析。对每个荧光光谱以及单独的漫反射光谱进行PCA,以建立每个光谱的一组主成分。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来确定哪些主成分在恶性和非恶性组织之间显示出统计学上的显著差异。最后,利用支持向量机(SVM)算法根据具有诊断价值的主成分对样本进行分类。对这种非参数算法进行交叉验证,以无偏方式确定其分类准确性。多激发荧光光谱成功地区分了恶性和非恶性组织,灵敏度和特异性分别为70%和92%。单独的漫反射光谱的灵敏度(30%)和特异性(78%)显著较低。结合荧光光谱和漫反射光谱并没有提高基于单独荧光光谱的算法的分类准确性。从PCA - SVM算法中确定为具有诊断性的荧光激发 - 发射波长表明,用于乳腺癌诊断的重要荧光团很可能是色氨酸、NAD(P)H和黄素蛋白。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验