Harindra V, Underhill G, Tobin J M
Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Milton Road, Portsmouth PO3 6AD, UK.
Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Nov;14(11):723-6. doi: 10.1258/09564620360719732.
Our objective was to compare the sensitivities for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, of the ligase chain reaction (LCR) on first voided urine (FVU) specimens and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) on pooled endocervical/endourethral swabs from women and endourethral swabs from men. Men and women taking part in the UK chlamydia screening pilot were tested for chlamydia using LCR on a FVU. Patients attending genitourinary medicine clinics also had cervical and/or urethral swabs taken for chlamydia testing by EIA. In women, EIA on pooled swabs detected 575 of the 785 chlamydia positives and in men, EIA detected 209 of 351 positives. The sensitivity of EIA was 73% and 60% in women and men respectively. By using the EIA test, therefore, 27-40% of patients infected with chlamydia will be given a false negative result. We propose that it is unethical to use non-molecular testing in the future.
我们的目标是比较检测沙眼衣原体的灵敏度,即对首次晨尿(FVU)样本进行连接酶链反应(LCR),以及对女性宫颈/尿道拭子合并样本和男性尿道拭子进行酶免疫测定(EIA)。参与英国衣原体筛查试点的男性和女性使用LCR对FVU进行衣原体检测。到泌尿生殖医学诊所就诊的患者也采集了宫颈和/或尿道拭子,通过EIA进行衣原体检测。在女性中,合并拭子的EIA检测出785例衣原体阳性患者中的575例,在男性中,EIA检测出351例阳性患者中的209例。EIA在女性和男性中的灵敏度分别为73%和60%。因此,通过使用EIA检测,27%-40%感染衣原体的患者将得到假阴性结果。我们认为,未来使用非分子检测是不道德的。