Simon Chantal, Little Paul, Birtwistle Jon, Kendrick Tony
Department of Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2003 Mar;11(2):129-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00408.x.
Stroke affects 120 000 people each year in the UK and is the most common cause of adult-onset disability. Most stroke patients are cared for at home by informal carers. Support for these carers is provided by the community services, but although single-item measures have shown that there is a relatively high level of dissatisfaction with those services, there is no specific satisfaction measurement instrument. The present study aimed to construct and initially validate a questionnaire to measure carers' satisfaction with community services for clinical and research purposes. Qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of informal carers of stroke patients identified via stroke unit discharge records gave information about content, context and language. Together with information from the carers' literature, this formed the basis of the questionnaire. A self-completion questionnaire proved unacceptable to carers with a very poor response rate (20%). Face-to-face interviews were more acceptable, with the questionnaire taking approximately 10 minutes to administer. All carers approached agreed to take part and only three carers dropped out from follow up, all because of reasons not related to the study. Initial validity and reliability testing with a sample of 44 carers identified through stroke groups and general practice showed good correlation with a single-item satisfaction measure (RHO = 0.797), test-retest reliability (RHO = 0.885) and inter-rater reliability (RHO = 0.868), and a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.859). Further validation with larger and more diverse groups of informal carers is needed before the questionnaire can be considered to be a robust and reliable tool. Factor analysis revealed seven factors: information about community support and involving the carer; amount, appropriateness and coordination of services; information about stroke; speed of change and concern about the carer; listening to the carer and being heard; problem management; and confidence in and accuracy of information. These factors have marked similarities to those found in the field of patient satisfaction with community services.
在英国,每年有12万人罹患中风,中风是成人残疾的最常见病因。大多数中风患者由非正式护理人员在家照料。社区服务为这些护理人员提供支持,然而,尽管单项措施表明对这些服务的不满程度相对较高,但却没有专门的满意度测量工具。本研究旨在构建并初步验证一份问卷,用于临床和研究目的,以测量护理人员对社区服务的满意度。通过中风单元出院记录确定了中风患者非正式护理人员的目标样本,对其进行定性访谈,获取了有关内容、背景和语言方面的信息。这些信息与护理人员文献中的信息共同构成了问卷的基础。事实证明,自填式问卷对于护理人员来说不可接受,回复率极低(20%)。面对面访谈更易被接受,完成问卷大约需要10分钟。所有受访的护理人员均同意参与,仅有三名护理人员在随访过程中退出,均因与研究无关的原因。对通过中风群体和全科医疗确定的44名护理人员样本进行的初步效度和信度测试表明,该问卷与单项满意度测量具有良好的相关性(相关系数 = 为0.797)、重测信度(相关系数 = 0.885)和评分者间信度(相关系数 = 0.868),以及高度的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数 = 0.859)。在该问卷被视为一个强大且可靠的工具之前,需要对更多不同类型的非正式护理人员群体进行进一步验证。因子分析揭示了七个因子:关于社区支持及让护理人员参与其中的信息;服务的数量、适宜性和协调性;关于中风的信息;变化速度及对护理人员的关切;倾听护理人员意见并被倾听;问题管理;以及对信息的信心和准确性。这些因子与患者对社区服务满意度领域中发现的因子有显著相似之处。