Arnold Kathryn E, Orr Kate J, Griffiths Richard
Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Mol Ecol. 2003 Dec;12(12):3451-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02007.x.
Sex allocation studies seek to ascertain whether mothers manipulate offspring sex ratio prior to ovulation. To do so, DNA for molecular sexing should be collected as soon after conception as possible, but instead neonates are usually sampled. Here, we aim to identify and quantify some of the problems associated with using molecular techniques to identify the sex of newly laid avian eggs. From both fertilized and unfertilized chicken (Gallus gallus) eggs, we sampled (1) the blastoderm/disc, (2) vitelline membrane and (3) a mixture of (1) and (2). Thus, we replicated scenarios under which contaminated samples are taken and/or unfertilized eggs are not identified as such and are sampled. We found that two commonly used molecular sexing tests, based on the CHD-1 genes, differed in sensitivity, but this did not always predict their ability to sex egg samples. The vitelline membrane was a considerable source of maternal and probably paternal contamination. Fertile eggs were regularly assigned the wrong sex when vitelline membrane contaminated the blastoderm sample. The membrane of unfertilized eggs was always female, i.e. maternal DNA had been amplified. DNA was amplified from 47 to 63% of unfertilized blastodiscs, even though it was highly unlikely that DNA from a single haploid cell could be amplified reliably using these polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Surprisingly, the blastodiscs were identified as both males and females. We suggest that in these cases only maternal DNA was amplified, and that 'false' males, Z not ZZ, were detected. This was due to the reduced ability of both sets of primers to anneal to the W chromosome compared to the Z chromosome at low DNA concentrations. Overall, our data suggested that estimates of primary sex ratios based on newly laid eggs will be appreciably inaccurate.
性别分配研究旨在确定母亲是否在排卵前操纵后代的性别比例。为此,分子性别鉴定的DNA应在受孕后尽快收集,但通常采集的却是新生儿样本。在此,我们旨在识别和量化使用分子技术鉴定新产禽蛋性别的一些相关问题。我们从受精和未受精的鸡蛋(家鸡)中,分别采集了(1)胚盘/胚盘区、(2)卵黄膜和(3)(1)与(2)的混合物。因此,我们模拟了采集到受污染样本和/或未识别出未受精卵并对其进行采样的情况。我们发现,基于CHD - 1基因的两种常用分子性别鉴定测试在灵敏度上存在差异,但这并不总能预测它们对鸡蛋样本进行性别鉴定的能力。卵黄膜是母体污染的一个重要来源,可能也是父体污染的来源。当卵黄膜污染胚盘样本时,受精蛋经常被错误地鉴定性别。未受精卵的膜总是呈雌性,即母体DNA被扩增了。即便使用这些聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术从单个单倍体细胞中可靠地扩增DNA的可能性极小,但仍有47%至63%的未受精胚盘区扩增出了DNA。令人惊讶的是,这些胚盘区被鉴定为雄性和雌性都有。我们认为在这些情况下,只有母体DNA被扩增了,并且检测到的“假”雄性是Z而不是ZZ。这是由于在低DNA浓度下,与Z染色体相比,两组引物与W染色体退火的能力降低所致。总体而言,我们的数据表明,基于新产蛋的初始性别比例估计将明显不准确。