Michie Susan, Miles Jane, Weinman John
Department of Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):197-206. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00194-5.
The evidence as to whether patient-centredness is associated with beneficial physical and psychological outcomes is inconsistent. This review of published research on health care communication in chronic illness investigates whether (i) studies of patient-centred consultations use distinctive concepts, (ii) different concepts are differentially associated with health outcomes. Studies of patients with a chronic illness consulting a health professional were included if they measured health professional-patient interaction and a physical or psychological outcome. Thirty studies were identified, falling into two, reliably distinct, categories. In the first, health professionals took the patient's perspective and in the second, they sought to "activate" the patient. The 10 studies taking the latter approach were more consistently associated with good physical health outcomes than were the 20 studies taking the former approach. The suggestion that different types of patient-centredness have different associations with physical health outcomes should be investigated further in experimental studies.
关于以患者为中心是否与有益的身体和心理结果相关的证据并不一致。这项对已发表的慢性病医疗保健沟通研究的综述调查了:(i)以患者为中心的咨询研究是否使用独特的概念;(ii)不同的概念与健康结果之间的关联是否存在差异。如果研究测量了医疗保健专业人员与患者的互动以及身体或心理结果,则纳入对患有慢性病并咨询医疗保健专业人员的患者的研究。共识别出30项研究,分为两个可靠区分的类别。第一类中,医疗保健专业人员从患者的角度出发;第二类中,他们试图“激发”患者。采用后一种方法的10项研究比采用前一种方法的20项研究更一致地与良好的身体健康结果相关。不同类型的以患者为中心与身体健康结果之间存在不同关联这一观点,应在实验研究中进一步探讨。