Baron Elma D, Fourtanier Anny, Compan Delphine, Medaisko Chantal, Cooper Kevin D, Stevens Seth R
Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Oct;121(4):869-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12485.x.
Solar radiation causes immunosuppression that contributes to skin cancer growth. Photoprotective strategies initially focused on the more erythemogenic ultraviolet B. More recently, the relationship of ultraviolet A and skin cancer has received increased attention. We hypothesized that if ultraviolet A contributes significantly to human ultraviolet-induced immune suppression, then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during ultraviolet exposure. Two hundred and eleven volunteers were randomized into study groups and received solar-simulated radiation, ranging from 0 to 2 minimum erythema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlorobenzene. Contact hypersensitivity response was evaluated by measuring the increase in skin fold thickness of five graded dinitrochlorobenzene challenge sites on the arm, 2 wk after sensitization. Clinical scoring using the North American Contact Dermatitis Group method was also performed. Solar-simulated radiation dose-response curves were generated and immune protection factor was calculated using a nonlinear regression model. Significance of immune protection between study groups was determined with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon exact test. The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 10, based on the in vivo persistent pigment darkening method) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15 demonstrated better immune protection than the product that had a low ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 2) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15. Nonlinear regression analysis based on skin fold thickness increase revealed that the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more than three times its sun protection factor, whereas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which was equal to its labeled sun protection factor. This study demonstrates that ultraviolet A contributes greatly to human immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity results in immune protection that exceeds erythema protection. These results show that high ultraviolet A protection is required to protect against ultraviolet-induced damage to cutaneous immunity.
太阳辐射会导致免疫抑制,从而促进皮肤癌的生长。光保护策略最初聚焦于更易引发红斑的紫外线B。最近,紫外线A与皮肤癌的关系受到了更多关注。我们假设,如果紫外线A对人类紫外线诱导的免疫抑制有显著影响,那么防晒霜增加对紫外线A的过滤将能在紫外线暴露期间更好地保护免疫系统。211名志愿者被随机分为研究组,在致敏前48小时,于臀部分别接受0至2最小红斑量的模拟太阳辐射,辐射时使用或不使用防晒霜。致敏2周后,通过测量手臂上五个分级二硝基氯苯激发部位的皮肤褶皱厚度增加来评估接触性超敏反应。同时采用北美接触性皮炎组方法进行临床评分。生成模拟太阳辐射剂量反应曲线,并使用非线性回归模型计算免疫保护因子。用曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森精确检验确定研究组之间免疫保护的显著性。具有高紫外线A吸收率(基于体内持续色素沉着变黑法,紫外线A保护因子为10)且标注防晒系数为15的防晒霜,比紫外线A吸收率低(紫外线A保护因子为2)且标注防晒系数为15的产品表现出更好的免疫保护作用。基于皮肤褶皱厚度增加的非线性回归分析显示,高紫外线A保护因子的防晒霜免疫保护因子为50,超过其防晒系数的三倍,而低紫外线A保护因子的防晒霜免疫保护因子为15,与其标注的防晒系数相等。本研究表明,紫外线A对人类免疫抑制有很大影响,具有高紫外线A过滤能力的广谱防晒霜所提供的免疫保护超过了对红斑的保护。这些结果表明,需要高紫外线A防护来防止紫外线对皮肤免疫造成损伤。