Lear Jonathan
Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago, 1130 East 59th Street, Chicago IL 60637, USA.
Int J Psychoanal. 2003 Oct;84(Pt 5):1351-61. doi: 10.1516/00207570360720506.
In this paper the author addresses the question of the significance of psychoanalysis for moral psychology via a more specific question: the impact of psychoanalysis on British philosophy in the twentieth century. He argues that there has been no influence of any real significance, and offers intellectual reasons why not. However, he also argues that there has recently emerged the possibility for a future engagement between psychoanalysis and philosophy, and he offers a history of the emergence of this possibility. In particular, the author discusses how the emerging interest within philosophy to work out a satisfying approach to naturalist moral psychology leads it to a concern with internal mental structure and, most importantly, to transformations of intrapsychic structures. He believes that this will lead philosophy to take a greater interest in psychoanalysis.
在本文中,作者通过一个更具体的问题探讨了精神分析对于道德心理学的意义:精神分析对20世纪英国哲学的影响。他认为不存在任何具有实际意义的影响,并给出了相应的学术理由。然而,他也指出,最近精神分析与哲学之间出现了未来相互交融的可能性,并且他阐述了这种可能性的出现历程。具体而言,作者讨论了哲学界新出现的一种兴趣,即寻求一种令人满意的自然主义道德心理学方法,这使得哲学关注内部心理结构,最重要的是,关注心理内部结构的转变。他认为这将使哲学对精神分析产生更大的兴趣。