Webster Jamieson
Faculty, Eugene Lang College of The New School, NY, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2013 Jun;73(2):138-57. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2013.1.
Critical theory, whose aim was to historicize philosophy through integrating it with the social sciences, turned to psychoanalysis to find its way through an accounting of philosophy after the Second World War. Over 50 years after this initial project, the rift between philosophy and psychoanalysis has never been greater. If Jacques Lacan could be considered one of the few psychoanalysts to maintain and foster links to philosophical thought in the latter half of the 20th century, his work has sadly remained marginal in the clinical field throughout America and Europe. Both critical theory and Lacan remain skeptical of the direction taken by psychoanalysis after Freud. Reflecting on the history of these two disciplines, as well as through an examination of Theodor Adorno's posthumously published dream journal, critique and cure emerge as two dialectically intertwined themes that gain momentum in the dream of the unification of the philosophical and psychoanalytic projects.
批判理论旨在通过将哲学与社会科学相结合使其历史化,在第二次世界大战后,它转向精神分析以探寻哲学发展之路。在这个最初的计划实施50多年后,哲学与精神分析之间的裂痕从未如此巨大。如果雅克·拉康可以被视为20世纪后半叶少数保持并促进与哲学思想联系的精神分析学家之一,那么令人遗憾的是,他的著作在美国和欧洲的临床领域一直处于边缘地位。批判理论和拉康都对弗洛伊德之后精神分析的发展方向持怀疑态度。通过反思这两门学科的历史,并审视西奥多·阿多诺死后出版的梦境日记,批判与治愈成为两个辩证交织的主题,它们在哲学与精神分析计划统一的梦想中获得了动力。