Jiang Shan-ping, Huang Li-wen, Wang Jing-feng, Wu Wei, Yin Song-mei, Chen Wei-xian, Zhan Jun, Yan Li, Chen Xi-long, Li Jian-jun, Ma Li-ping, Li Jian-guo, Huang Zhi-tong
Department of Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;26(10):594-7.
To investigate measures to prevent the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in healthcare workers in isolation units.
The architectural factors and the infection of healthcare workers in different wards in our hospital between 30 January 2003 and 30 March 2003 were analyzed.
Four kinds of isolation wards were evaluated, including the ward where the thirty-first bed lied in on the twelfth floor, the laminar flow ward in the intensive care unit (ICU) where the tenth bed lied in on the fifteenth floor, the ward where the twenty-seventh bed lied in on the thirteenth floor of Building A, and thirty wards on the fourteenth to eighteenth floors of Building B. The ratios (m2/m3) of the area of the ventilation windows to the volume of the room were 0, 0, 1:95 and 1:40, respectively. Numbers of SARS cases in the wards mentioned above were 1, 1, 1 and 96, respectively. The total lengths (hour) of hospitalization were 43, 168, 110 and 1,272, respectively. The infection rates of the healthcare workers in the areas mentioned above were 73%, 32%, 28% and 2%, respectively. The difference of the infection rates was of statistical significance.
In addition to strict personal protective measures, isolation of SARS cases in wards with high ratio of the area of ventilation windows to the volume of the room and good ventilation may be the key to preventing the outbreak of SARS in healthcare workers in isolation units.
探讨隔离病房医护人员预防严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)暴发的措施。
分析我院2003年1月30日至2003年3月30日不同病房的建筑因素及医护人员感染情况。
评估了四种隔离病房,包括十二楼31号床所在病房、十五楼重症监护病房(ICU)中10号床所在的层流病房、A楼十三楼27号床所在病房以及B楼十四至十八楼的30个病房。通风窗面积与房间体积的比值(m²/m³)分别为0、0、1:95和1:40。上述病房的SARS病例数分别为1例、1例、1例和96例。住院总时长(小时)分别为43小时、168小时、110小时和1272小时。上述区域医护人员的感染率分别为73%、32%、28%和2%。感染率差异具有统计学意义。
除严格的个人防护措施外,将SARS病例隔离在通风窗面积与房间体积比值高且通风良好的病房,可能是预防隔离病房医护人员SARS暴发的关键。