Nishiyama Nobuhiro, Nori Aparna, Malugin Alexander, Kasuya Yuji, Kopecková Pavla, Kopecek Jindrich
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry/Center for Controlled Chemical Delivery (CCCD), University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Room 301, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 15;63(22):7876-82.
The effects of geldanamycin (GA), 17-(3-aminopropylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (AP-GA), and N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer-AP-GA conjugate [P(AP-GA)] on A2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells at an equitoxic dose (2x IC(50)) were compared by the gene expression array analysis. All treatments resulted in similar gene expression profiles up to 12 h (e.g., down-regulation of CDK4 and up-regulation of APAF-1), although P(AP-GA)-treated cells showed delayed gene expression because of time-dependent internalization of the conjugate and intracellular drug release from P(AP-GA). However, AP-GA-treated cells showed elevated expression of HSP70 and HSP27 after 6 h compared with that observed by GA and P(AP-GA) treatments. Depletion of C-Raf, an HSP90 client protein, was observed in all treatments up to 12 h. Confocal microscopy using mesochlorin e(6) as a model drug revealed that drug release caused by the lysosomal cleavage of glycylphenylalanylleucylglycine oligopeptide spacer, used as GA derivative copolymer attachment/release point, was moderately fast. These results suggested that AP-GA treatment may activate stress-response pathways, whereas P(AP-GA) treatment may suppress them and trigger signaling pathways essential to cell growth arrest and death by inducing an HSP90-active factor. Although GA and P(AP-GA) treatments induced a time-dependent increase in HSP70 and HSP27 protein expression (detected by Western blotting analysis), AP-GA treatment resulted in more rapid and more intense expression of both proteins. Our results suggest that conjugation of AP-GA to N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer may be able to modulate the cell stress responses induced by AP-GA because of differences in its internalization mechanism, subcellular localization, and intracellular concentration gradients.
通过基因表达阵列分析比较了格尔德霉素(GA)、17-(3-氨丙基氨基)-17-去甲氧基格尔德霉素(AP-GA)和N-(2-羟丙基)甲基丙烯酰胺共聚物-AP-GA缀合物[P(AP-GA)]在等毒性剂量(2×IC50)下对A2780人卵巢癌细胞的影响。所有处理在12小时内均导致相似的基因表达谱(例如,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4(CDK4)下调和凋亡蛋白酶激活因子-1(APAF-1)上调),尽管P(AP-GA)处理的细胞由于缀合物的时间依赖性内化和P(AP-GA)的细胞内药物释放而显示出延迟的基因表达。然而,与GA和P(AP-GA)处理相比,AP-GA处理的细胞在6小时后热休克蛋白70(HSP70)和热休克蛋白27(HSP27)的表达升高。在所有处理至12小时时均观察到HSP90客户蛋白C-Raf的消耗。使用中氯e(6)作为模型药物的共聚焦显微镜显示,用作GA衍生物共聚物附着/释放点的甘氨酰苯丙氨酰亮氨酰甘氨酸寡肽间隔物的溶酶体裂解引起的药物释放适中较快。这些结果表明,AP-GA处理可能激活应激反应途径,而P(AP-GA)处理可能抑制它们并通过诱导HSP90活性因子触发对细胞生长停滞和死亡至关重要的信号通路。尽管GA和P(AP-GA)处理诱导HSP70和HSP27蛋白表达随时间增加(通过蛋白质印迹分析检测),但AP-GA处理导致这两种蛋白的表达更快且更强烈。我们的结果表明,由于AP-GA与N-(2-羟丙基)甲基丙烯酰胺共聚物缀合的内化机制、亚细胞定位和细胞内浓度梯度不同,可能能够调节AP-GA诱导的细胞应激反应。