• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科医学康复的测量标准。

Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation.

作者信息

Johnston M V, Keith R A, Hinderer S R

机构信息

Task Force on Measurement and Evaluation, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Skokie, IL.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Dec;73(12-S):S3-23.

PMID:1463386
Abstract

Rehabilitation must address problems inherent in the measurement of human function and health-related quality of life, as well as problems in diagnosis and measurement of impairment. This educational document presents an initial set of standards to be used as guidelines for development and use of measurement and evaluation procedures and instruments for interdisciplinary, health-related rehabilitation. Part I covers general measurement principles and technical standards, beginning with validity, the central consideration for use of measures. Subsequent sections focus on reliability and errors of measurement, norms and scaling, development of measures, and technical manuals and guides. Part II covers principles and standards for use of measures. General principles of application of measures in practice are discussed first, followed by standards to protect persons being measured and then by standards for administrative applications. Many explanations, examples, and references are provided to help professionals understand measurement principles. Improved measurement will ensure the basis of rehabilitation as a science and nourish its success as a clinical service.

摘要

康复必须解决人类功能及健康相关生活质量测量中固有的问题,以及损伤诊断与测量方面的问题。本教育文件提出了一套初步标准,用作制定和使用跨学科、健康相关康复测量与评估程序及工具的指导方针。第一部分涵盖一般测量原则和技术标准,从效度开始,这是测量工具使用的核心考量因素。后续章节重点关注信度与测量误差、常模与量表、测量工具的开发以及技术手册和指南。第二部分涵盖测量工具使用的原则和标准。首先讨论测量工具在实践中的一般应用原则,接着是保护被测者的标准,然后是行政应用标准。文中提供了许多解释、示例和参考文献,以帮助专业人员理解测量原则。改进测量将确保康复作为一门科学的基础,并促进其作为临床服务的成功。

相似文献

1
Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation.跨学科医学康复的测量标准。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Dec;73(12-S):S3-23.
2
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
[Determining the quality of rater judgements using intraclass correlation, and enhancing rater judgements].[使用组内相关性确定评分者判断的质量,并增强评分者判断]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Dec;43(6):384-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814935.
5
Clinical utility of measures of breathlessness.呼吸急促测量的临床效用。
Respir Care. 2002 Sep;47(9):986-93.
6
Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.量化腰椎屈伸放松现象:理论、正常数据及临床应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1435-46. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067085.46840.5A.
7
Functional assessment measures in medical rehabilitation: current status.医学康复中的功能评估措施:现状
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Feb;65(2):74-8.
8
Standards of care in reproductive health services.生殖健康服务中的护理标准。
West J Med. 1995 Sep;163(3 Suppl):28-32.
9
A National Health Service Hospital's cardiac rehabilitation programme: a qualitative analysis of provision.一家国民保健服务医院的心脏康复计划:服务提供情况的定性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1908-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01815.x.
10
[References for evaluation instruments for quality assurance in rehabilitation--2. The IRES questionnaire for clinical aspects and research].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1995 May;34(2):XIII-XXIV.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional and work capacity evaluation issues.功能与工作能力评估问题。
J Chiropr Med. 2004 Winter;3(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60059-7.
2
Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.脊髓损伤的结局指标:近期评估及未来方向建议
Spinal Cord. 2009 Aug;47(8):582-91. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.18. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
3
Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury.迈向测量评估指南:以脊髓损伤为例的介绍
J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(1):13-26. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11753976.
4
The three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis - Part III, correlation with clinical classification and parameters.脊柱侧弯的三维简易形态学(3-DEMO)分类 - 第三部分,与临床分类及参数的相关性
Scoliosis. 2007 Mar 19;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-2-5.
5
The clubfoot assessment protocol (CAP); description and reliability of a structured multi-level instrument for follow-up.马蹄内翻足评估方案(CAP);一种用于随访的结构化多层次工具的描述及可靠性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Jul 18;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-40.
6
History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts.图片活动及任务分类的历史、设计特点和用途。
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Sep;14(3):175-95. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000022760.71820.91.
7
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement.膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)——全膝关节置换术中的验证及与WOMAC评分的比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
8
Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability.与工作残疾相关的功能评估措施数据库的开发。
J Occup Rehabil. 2001 Sep;11(3):177-99. doi: 10.1023/a:1013074527605.
9
Rehabilitation: the Cinderella of neurological research? A bibliometric study.
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1995 Oct;16(7):473-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02229325.