Glaister Mark, Stone Michael H, Stewart Andrew M, Hughes Michael, Moir Gavin L
Department of Physical Education, Sport, and Leisure Studies, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Nov;17(4):781-4. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0781:ropods>2.0.co;2.
The aims of the present study were: (a) to determine the number of familiarization trials required to establish a high degree of reliability in measures of power output during maximal intermittent cycling; and (b) to examine the reliability of those same measures after familiarization had been established. On separate days over a 3-week period, 2 groups of 7 recreationally active men completed 8 trials of 1 of 2 maximal (20 x 5-second) intermittent cycling tests with contrasting recovery periods (10-seconds or 30-seconds). Significant (p < 0.05) between-trial differences were detected in post-hoc tests involving trials 1 and 2 only. Within-subject test-retest reliability was therefore assessed across trials 3-8. Apart from values of maximum power output in Protocol 1 (10-second recovery periods), all remaining measures of power output showed high degrees of within-subject test-retest reliability (coefficient of variation: 2.4-3.7%). The results of the present study indicate that in subjects unfamiliar with maximal intermittent cycling, high degrees of reliability in many performance measures can be achieved following the completion of 2 familiarization trials.
