Zhang Zhang-Jin, Xing Guo-Qiang, Russell Shani, Obeng Kris, Post Robert M
Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A.
Epilepsia. 2003 Dec;44(12):1487-93. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.34803.x.
Tolerance is a potential problem in long-term anticonvulsant therapy of epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and neuropathic pain. The present study was designed to determine whether cross-tolerance occurs between levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in amygdala-kindled rats.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with an electrode into the left amygdala. While kindling stimulation was started, animals received repeated treatment (i.p.) with saline (n = 7) or LEV (150 mg/kg, n = 8). Saline-injected rats were subsequently challenged with a single dose of 150 mg/kg LEV when full kindling developed (stage > or =4). Both groups of rats were then administered long-term CBZ (5 mg/kg) until rats developed complete tolerance. All CBZ-tolerant rats were subsequently re-exposed to LEV (150 mg/kg) for an additional 10 consecutive days.
Repeated LEV treatment significantly suppressed the increase in seizure stage, seizure duration, and afterdischarge duration induced by amygdala stimulation, markedly increasing the number of stimulations to achieve a kindling major motor seizure. The LEV challenge produced a more robust suppression of seizure stage in saline-injected rats compared with LEV-treated animals. CBZ treatment markedly suppressed fully kindled seizures in rats initially injected with saline, and then anticonvulsant tolerance rapidly developed after 3-4 days of repeated treatment. In contrast, rats that had initially received repeated LEV treatment did not show a response to treatment with CBZ (5 mg/kg). When CBZ-tolerant rats were subsequently exposed to LEV (150 mg/kg), noticeable anticonvulsant effects were observed; but these were gradually lost with increasing numbers of LEV exposures.
Whereas LEV shows potent antiepileptogenic and anticonvulsant effects in amygdala-kindled rats, its repeated treatment induces anticonvulsant tolerance and unidirectional cross-tolerance to CBZ. In contrast, anticonvulsant tolerance to CBZ does not transfer to LEV. The mechanistic implications of the present results for clinical therapeutics remain to be evaluated.
耐受性是癫痫、双相情感障碍和神经性疼痛长期抗惊厥治疗中的一个潜在问题。本研究旨在确定左乙拉西坦(LEV)和卡马西平(CBZ)在杏仁核点燃大鼠中是否会产生交叉耐受性。
将雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠的电极植入左侧杏仁核。在开始点燃刺激时,动物接受生理盐水(n = 7)或LEV(150 mg/kg,n = 8)的重复腹腔注射治疗。当完全点燃(阶段≥4)时,给注射生理盐水的大鼠单次注射150 mg/kg LEV进行激发试验。然后给两组大鼠长期注射CBZ(5 mg/kg),直到大鼠产生完全耐受性。随后,所有对CBZ耐受的大鼠连续10天再次接受LEV(150 mg/kg)治疗。
重复给予LEV治疗可显著抑制杏仁核刺激诱导的癫痫发作阶段、发作持续时间和放电后持续时间的增加,显著增加达到点燃性大运动发作所需的刺激次数。与接受LEV治疗的动物相比,LEV激发试验对注射生理盐水的大鼠的癫痫发作阶段产生了更强的抑制作用。CBZ治疗显著抑制了最初注射生理盐水的大鼠的完全点燃性癫痫发作,并且在重复治疗3 - 4天后迅速产生抗惊厥耐受性。相比之下,最初接受重复LEV治疗的大鼠对CBZ(5 mg/kg)治疗没有反应。当对CBZ耐受的大鼠随后接受LEV(150 mg/kg)治疗时,观察到明显的抗惊厥作用;但随着LEV暴露次数的增加,这些作用逐渐消失。
虽然LEV在杏仁核点燃大鼠中显示出强大的抗癫痫发生和抗惊厥作用,但其重复治疗会诱导抗惊厥耐受性和对CBZ的单向交叉耐受性。相比之下,对CBZ的抗惊厥耐受性不会转移到LEV。本研究结果对临床治疗的机制意义仍有待评估。