• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A post-marketing study on interferon beta 1b and 1a treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: different response in drop-outs and treated patients.一项关于干扰素β-1b和1a治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的上市后研究:退出治疗患者与接受治疗患者的不同反应。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;74(12):1689-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1689.
2
Interferon beta treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a post-marketing study in Lombardia, Italy. Multiple Sclerosis Centers of Lombardia, Italy.
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1999 Oct;20(5):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s100720050044.
3
Comparison of Betaferon, Avonex, and Rebif in treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.β-干扰素、阿沃尼单抗和利比治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的比较。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2006 May;113(5):283-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00585.x.
4
A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFN beta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.一项前瞻性、开放标签治疗试验,比较干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼单抗)、干扰素β-1b(倍泰龙)和醋酸格拉替雷(考帕松)对复发缓解型多发性硬化症复发率的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2001 Mar;8(2):141-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00189.x.
5
Interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an independent postmarketing study in southern Italy.β-干扰素治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症:意大利南部一项独立的上市后研究
Mult Scler. 2003 Oct;9(5):451-7. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms948oa.
6
A post-marketing study on immunomodulating treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Lombardia: preliminary results.
Neurol Sci. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 4:S171-3. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0509-3.
7
[Interferon beta-1b (Betaferon)therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: findings of a prospective, multi-center study of disease progression].[干扰素β-1b(倍泰龙)治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者:疾病进展的前瞻性多中心研究结果]
Nervenarzt. 2001 Apr;72(4):286-92. doi: 10.1007/s001150050752.
8
A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing--remitting multiple sclerosis: results after 18 months of therapy.一项前瞻性、开放标签治疗试验,比较干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼)、干扰素β-1b(倍泰龙)和醋酸格拉替雷(考帕松)对复发缓解型多发性硬化症复发率的影响:治疗18个月后的结果。
Mult Scler. 2001 Dec;7(6):349-53. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700601.
9
The IFNbeta treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in clinical practice: the experience at the MS Center of Bari, Italy.干扰素β在临床实践中治疗多发性硬化症(MS):意大利巴里MS中心的经验。
Neurol Sci. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 4:S179-82. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0511-9.
10
[Open trial of the effectiveness of interferon beta 1a (Avonex) in multiple sclerosis. Clinical assessment using motor coordination tests].干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼)治疗多发性硬化症有效性的开放试验。使用运动协调测试进行临床评估
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):1163-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistence to disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in a Canadian cohort.加拿大队列中对多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的持久性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jun 28;11:1093-1101. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S138263. eCollection 2017.
2
Dimethyl fumarate in the management of multiple sclerosis: appropriate patient selection and special considerations.富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的应用:合适的患者选择及特殊考量
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Mar 2;12:339-50. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S85099. eCollection 2016.
3
Postmarketing Safety Profile of Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a Given 3 Times Weekly: A Retrospective Administrative Claims Analysis.皮下注射干扰素β-1a每周3次的上市后安全性概况:一项回顾性管理索赔分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Aug;21(8):650-60. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.8.650.
4
Interferon Beta-1a (AVONEX®) as a Treatment Option for Untreated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (AXIOM): A Prospective, Observational Study.干扰素β-1a(安万特)作为未经治疗的多发性硬化症患者的一种治疗选择(AXIOM):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Jul 6;16(7):15271-86. doi: 10.3390/ijms160715271.
5
The Combined Effect of Nursing Support and Adverse Event Mitigation on Adherence to Interferon Beta-1b Therapy in Early Multiple Sclerosis: The START Study.护理支持与不良事件缓解对早期多发性硬化症患者干扰素β-1b治疗依从性的联合影响:START研究
Int J MS Care. 2012 Winter;14(4):198-208. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073-14.4.198.
6
Can a physician predict the clinical response to first-line immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,医生能否预测一线免疫调节治疗的临床反应?
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012;8:465-73. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S36771. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
7
Country, sex, EDSS change and therapy choice independently predict treatment discontinuation in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome.国家、性别、EDSS 变化和治疗选择独立预测多发性硬化症和临床孤立综合征的治疗中断。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038661. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Adherence to interferon β-1b treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis in Spain.西班牙多发性硬化症患者对干扰素 β-1b 治疗的依从性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035600. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
Patient perceptions of multiple sclerosis and its treatment.患者对多发性硬化症及其治疗的认知。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:263-73. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S27038. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
The prevalence of injection-site reactions with disease-modifying therapies and their effect on adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis: an observational study.多发性硬化症患者使用疾病修正治疗药物后的注射部位反应发生率及其对依从性的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMC Neurol. 2011 Nov 10;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-144.

一项关于干扰素β-1b和1a治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的上市后研究:退出治疗患者与接受治疗患者的不同反应。

A post-marketing study on interferon beta 1b and 1a treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: different response in drop-outs and treated patients.

作者信息

Milanese C, La Mantia L, Palumbo R, Martinelli V, Murialdo A, Zaffaroni M, Caputo D, Capra R, Bergamaschi R

机构信息

Centro Regionale per la Cura della Sclerosi Multipla, Istituto Nazionale Neurologico C Besta, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;74(12):1689-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1689.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1689
PMID:14638892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1757434/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interferon beta 1b (Betaferon) and 1a (Avonex) were licensed in Italy for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in February 1996 and August 1997, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of these agents on the basis of clinical experience in northern Italian multiple sclerosis centres.

DESIGN

Clinical data on patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were collected on an appropriate form from 65 centres in northern Italy. Intention to treat analysis was not possible, so patients who discontinued treatment (drop-outs) and who continued treatment (treated) were analysed separately. The main outcome measures were annual relapse frequency, number of relapse-free patients, mean change in extended disability status scale score (EDSS), and number of patients who worsened.

RESULTS

1481 patients were included; 834 were treated with Betaferon and 647 with Avonex for mean periods of 21.4 and 12.0 months, respectively. Basal EDSS was 2.37 and 2.17, respectively, and relapse frequency was 1.62 and 1.45. The annual relapse rate decreased by more than 60% with Betaferon and 55% with Avonex. The proportions of relapse-free, improved, and worsened patients were similar in the two groups. More patients interrupted treatment with Betaferon (41.1%) than with Avonex (15.3%); such patients showed more active disease at baseline and during treatment. The incidence of side effects was higher in Betaferon treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of Betaferon and Avonex is confirmed. There was a more marked effect than expected from the experimental trial results. This might reflect differences in inclusion criteria, or, more likely, loss of drop-outs, favouring selective retention of responders.

摘要

背景

干扰素β1b(倍泰龙)和1a(阿沃尼)分别于1996年2月和1997年8月在意大利获批用于治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症。

目的

根据意大利北部多发性硬化症中心的临床经验评估这些药物的有效性。

设计

从意大利北部的65个中心以合适的表格收集复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的临床数据。由于无法进行意向性治疗分析,因此对停止治疗的患者(退出者)和继续治疗的患者(治疗者)分别进行分析。主要结局指标为年复发频率、无复发患者数量、扩展残疾状态量表评分(EDSS)的平均变化以及病情恶化的患者数量。

结果

纳入1481例患者;834例接受倍泰龙治疗,647例接受阿沃尼治疗,平均治疗时间分别为21.4个月和12.0个月。基础EDSS分别为2.37和2.17,复发频率分别为1.62和1.45。使用倍泰龙时年复发率降低超过60%,使用阿沃尼时降低55%。两组中无复发、病情改善和病情恶化的患者比例相似。中断倍泰龙治疗的患者(41.1%)多于阿沃尼治疗的患者(15.3%);此类患者在基线和治疗期间疾病活动度更高。接受倍泰龙治疗的患者副作用发生率更高。

结论

倍泰龙和阿沃尼的有效性得到证实。其效果比实验性试验结果预期的更为显著。这可能反映了纳入标准的差异,或者更有可能是退出者的流失,有利于选择性保留反应者。