在临床实践指南中运用社会经济证据。
Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines.
作者信息
Aldrich Rosemary, Kemp Lynn, Williams Jenny Stewart, Harris Elizabeth, Simpson Sarah, Wilson Amanda, McGill Katie, Byles Julie, Lowe Julia, Jackson Terri
机构信息
Newcastle Institute of Public Health, PO Box 664J, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.
出版信息
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1283-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283.
Abstract
The effects of socioeconomic position on health have been largely ignored in clinical guidelines. Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council has produced a framework to ensure that they are taken into account
摘要
社会经济地位对健康的影响在临床指南中很大程度上被忽视了。澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会制定了一个框架，以确保这些影响能被考虑在内。
相似文献
1
Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines.在临床实践指南中运用社会经济证据。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1283-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283.
2
Impact of cancer-related decision aids.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2002 Jul(46):1-4.
3
No need to fear evidence-based medicine.无需惧怕循证医学。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;14(2):89-92. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1182. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
4
Making clinical decisions using a clinical practice guideline.运用临床实践指南做出临床决策。
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;34(7):519-28.
5
Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: an overview.循证医学与实践指南：概述
Cancer Control. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):362-7. doi: 10.1177/107327480000700411.
6
An evidence-based approach to clinical practice guidelines in periodontics.牙周病临床实践指南的循证方法。
Curr Opin Periodontol. 1997;4:96-103.
7
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines.GRADE证据到决策（EtD）框架：一种用于做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。2：临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 30;353:i2089. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2089.
8
Evidence-based decision-making 4: Development and limitations of clinical practice guidelines.循证决策4：临床实践指南的制定与局限性
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1281:443-53. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_26.
9
Preparing guidelines and documented clinical policies.制定指南和成文的临床政策。
Ann Oncol. 1998 Oct;9(10):1073-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008472410946.
10
Implications of lack of concordance among oncologists for evidence-based medicine derived clinical guidelines.肿瘤学家之间缺乏一致性对基于循证医学的临床指南的影响。
Med Health R I. 2003 Aug;86(8):228-30.
引用本文的文献
1
How Can We Make Information on Equity in Clinical Guidelines More Usable for Clinicians? A Case Study Methodology of General Practitioners.我们如何使临床指南中的公平性信息对临床医生更具实用性？一项针对全科医生的案例研究方法
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14320. doi: 10.1111/jep.14320.
2
Health equity considerations in guideline development: a rapid scoping review.卫生公平性在指南制定中的考虑因素：快速范围综述。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;11(2):E357-E371. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220130. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
3
The Health Inequalities Assessment Toolkit: supporting integration of equity into applied health research.健康不平等评估工具包：支持将公平性纳入应用健康研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):567-572. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa047.
4
Impact and use of reviews and 'overviews of reviews' to inform clinical practice guideline recommendations: protocol for a methods study.影响和使用综述及“综述的综述”来为临床实践指南推荐提供信息：方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e031442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031442.
5
GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist.GRADE公平性指南2：在GRADE指南制定中考虑健康公平性：指南制定清单的公平性扩展
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
Reaching beyond the review of research evidence: a qualitative study of decision making during the development of clinical practice guidelines for disease prevention in healthcare.超越研究证据的综述：一项关于医疗保健中疾病预防临床实践指南制定过程中决策的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 11;17(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2277-1.
7
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale.GRADE公平性指南1：在GRADE指南制定过程中考虑健康公平性：引言与基本原理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Development of a PubMed Based Search Tool for Identifying Sex and Gender Specific Health Literature.开发一种基于PubMed的用于识别性别特异性健康文献的检索工具。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;25(2):181-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5217. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis.临床实践指南中如何处理公平性问题：一项内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 5;4(12):e005660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005660.
10
The impact of socioeconomic status on changes in the general and mental health of women over time: evidence from a longitudinal study of Australian women.随着时间的推移，社会经济地位对女性一般和心理健康变化的影响：来自澳大利亚女性纵向研究的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Apr 9;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-25.
本文引用的文献
1
Representation of South Asian people in randomised clinical trials: analysis of trials' data.随机临床试验中南亚人群的代表性：试验数据分析
BMJ. 2003 Jun 7;326(7401):1244-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1244.
2
Quality of care provided by general practitioners using or not using Division-based diabetes registers.使用或未使用基于分区的糖尿病登记册的全科医生所提供的护理质量。
Med J Aust. 2002 Sep 2;177(5):250-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04757.x.
3
The inverse care law revisited: impact of disadvantaged location on accessing longer GP consultation times.再探逆医疗法则：不利地理位置对获得更长全科医生诊疗时间的影响
Med J Aust. 2002 Jul 15;177(2):80-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04673.x.
4
A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines.一种基于证据的指南中推荐分级的新系统。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):334-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334.
5
Adherence in social context.
Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5 Suppl):184S-7S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00076-3.
6
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.改善健康的复杂干预措施的设计与评估框架。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
7
Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.哪些临床研究能提供最佳证据？最佳的随机对照试验仍然胜过最佳的观察性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):255-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.255.
8
Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.非裔美国人和白人成年人中2型糖尿病的发病情况：社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
JAMA. 2000 May 3;283(17):2253-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.17.2253.
9
Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.卫生服务研究中复杂干预措施的开发与评估：南安普顿心脏综合护理项目（SHIP）案例研究。SHIP协作组
BMJ. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):711-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.711.
10
Narrative based medicine: narrative based medicine in an evidence based world.基于叙事的医学：循证世界中的基于叙事的医学。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):323-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.323.
Zotero 插件