• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.

作者信息

Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A L, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P

机构信息

Office of the President, Medical Research Council of Canada, 1600 Scott Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1 OW9.

出版信息

BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
PMID:10987780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1118564/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.改善健康的复杂干预措施的设计与评估框架。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
2
Risk of bias in randomised controlled trials of health behaviour change interventions: evidence, practices and challenges.健康行为改变干预措施的随机对照试验中的偏倚风险：证据、实践与挑战
Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.960653.
3
Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors.评估健康促进：三个错误的故事。
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Feb;39(2-3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00035-x.
4
Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being.健康促进研究中随机对照试验的实施与自主性在人类健康和福祉中的作用之间的紧张关系。
Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Dec;26(3):263-268. doi: 10.1071/HE15032.
5
Contextual evidence in clinical medicine and health promotion.临床医学与健康促进中的背景证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):548-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn082. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
6
Study design in the evaluation of combined radiotherapy plus chemotherapy.联合放疗与化疗评估中的研究设计。
Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(7):773-5. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90147-l.
7
The design and use of cluster randomised controlled trials in evaluating injury prevention interventions: part 2. Design effect, sample size calculations and methods for analysis.群组随机对照试验在评估伤害预防干预措施中的设计与应用：第2部分。设计效应、样本量计算及分析方法。
Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;16(2):132-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.023127.
8
Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.体育活动与运动促进实验研究的设计与分析考量：随机对照试验的优势
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Jun;34(3):220-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.3.220.
9
[Epidemiological studies in evaluation of effectiveness of health promotion programmes].[评估健康促进项目效果的流行病学研究]
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2000;4(4 Suppl 1):67-74.
10
Invited commentary: symposium on community intervention trials.特邀评论：社区干预试验研讨会
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 15;142(6):594-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117680.

引用本文的文献

1
User-Centered Design of Trauma Systems Solutions for Retriage of Patients With Injury: Mixed Methods Study.以患者为中心的创伤系统解决方案用于创伤患者分诊的设计：混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 27;27:e70846. doi: 10.2196/70846.
2
Perspectives of user groups in the co-creation of a targeted dental care service intervention for older adults receiving home healthcare: an explorative study.为接受家庭医疗保健的老年人共同创建针对性牙科护理服务干预措施中用户群体的观点：一项探索性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13156-z.
3
Feasibility of a Mental Health App Intervention for Emergency Service Workers and Volunteers: Single-Arm Pilot Study.针对应急服务工作者和志愿者的心理健康应用程序干预的可行性：单臂试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 28;9:e50995. doi: 10.2196/50995.
4
Blended therapy for adolescents with chronic health conditions to increase fatigue-related self-efficacy (Booster): protocol for a single-case multiple baseline study.针对患有慢性健康状况的青少年的混合疗法以提高与疲劳相关的自我效能（强化治疗）：一项单病例多基线研究方案
Trials. 2025 Jul 24;26(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08960-1.
5
PROTOCOL: the On Track 2.0 cluster randomized teacher-led intervention to support executive function and self-regulation.方案：“步入正轨2.0”集群随机教师主导干预措施，以支持执行功能和自我调节。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 24;16:1574860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574860. eCollection 2025.
6
Embedding violence prevention in existing religious and education systems: initial learning from formative research in the Safe Schools Study in Zimbabwe.将预防暴力融入现有的宗教和教育体系：来自津巴布韦安全学校研究中形成性研究的初步经验
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):2387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23186-1.
7
Exploring current approaches towards patient prioritisation for clinical pharmacy services in UK mental health inpatient care.探索英国心理健康住院护理中临床药学服务患者优先级确定的当前方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06956-4.
8
Process evaluation of a randomised trial of a triple low-dose combination pill strategy to improve hypertension control: a qualitative study.一项旨在改善高血压控制的三低剂量复方药丸策略随机试验的过程评估：一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e101689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101689.
9
Development and feasibility of a driving training program for Autistic student drivers.针对自闭症学生驾驶员的驾驶培训项目的开发与可行性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0324934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324934. eCollection 2025.
10
Patient acceptability of CITOBOT for cervical cancer screening: A mixed-method study.用于宫颈癌筛查的CITOBOT的患者可接受性：一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325805. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.评估健康与医疗领域全区域及基于组织的干预措施的方法：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92.
2
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.整群随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题
BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1407-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1407.
3
Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.制定和实施临床实践指南。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55.
4
Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.卫生服务研究中复杂干预措施的开发与评估：南安普顿心脏综合护理项目（SHIP）案例研究。SHIP协作组
BMJ. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):711-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.711.
5
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.评估用于临床试验的基于患者的疗效指标。
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i-iv, 1-74.
6
The effectiveness of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care: a systematic review.与住院医院护理相比，居家医院护理的有效性：一项系统评价。
J Public Health Med. 1998 Sep;20(3):344-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024778.
7
Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.循证临床实践的障碍与桥梁
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):273-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273.
8
Health services research clinical trials: issues in the evaluation of economic costs and benefits.卫生服务研究临床试验：经济成本与效益评估中的问题
Control Clin Trials. 1998 Apr;19(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00146-3.
9
Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions?为什么我们需要随机对照试验来评估行为干预措施？
BMJ. 1998 Feb 21;316(7131):611-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.611.
10
Surgical procedures and devices should be evaluated in the same way as medical therapy.外科手术程序和器械应以与药物治疗相同的方式进行评估。
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):478-87. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00114-6.