Bocket Laurence, Yazdanpanah Yazdan, Ajana Faïza, Gerard Yann, Viget Nathalie, Goffard Anne, Alcaraz Isabelle, Wattré Pierre, Mouton Yves
Service Universitaire de Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lille, Lille, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jan;53(1):89-94. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh006. Epub 2003 Nov 25.
The aims of this study were to: (i) determine the incidence of thymidine-associated mutations (TAMs) in an observational clinical cohort of naive HIV-1 patients who stopped first-line therapy including either zidovudine or stavudine; and (ii) assess the immunological and virological responses to subsequent second-line therapy in patients who switched from zidovudine to stavudine or conversely.
Plasma samples from 165 patients who stopped first-line antiretroviral therapy containing either zidovudine or stavudine were examined for the presence of drug-resistant genotypes. Subsequent second-line immunological and virological follow-up was performed in 136 patients who switched from zidovudine to stavudine and conversely.
Among the 93 patients who stopped first-line therapy including zidovudine and the 72 who stopped first-line therapy including stavudine, genotypic resistance testing was available for 67 (72%) and 54 (75%), respectively. The presence of TAMs was significantly more frequent in the zidovudine than the stavudine group (23.8% versus 5.5; P = 0.006). The short- and long-term immunological and virological responses to second-line therapy were comparable in the zidovudine and stavudine groups, despite different baseline profiles of viral resistance (median increase in CD4 cells/mm3 at 1 year of therapy, 118 versus 119; viral load <400 copies/mL, 47% versus 47%).
These results suggest that TAMs occur in more patients on antiretroviral regimens including zidovudine than on regimens including stavudine. Although the results from observational studies should be interpreted cautiously, these findings may be useful in determining the optimal sequencing of zidovudine and stavudine for the treatment of naive HIV-1-infected patients.
本研究的目的是:(i)确定在停止包含齐多夫定或司他夫定的一线治疗的初治HIV-1患者的观察性临床队列中胸苷相关突变(TAMs)的发生率;(ii)评估从齐多夫定转换为司他夫定或反之的患者对后续二线治疗的免疫和病毒学反应。
对165名停止包含齐多夫定或司他夫定的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者的血浆样本进行耐药基因型检测。对136名从齐多夫定转换为司他夫定或反之的患者进行了后续二线免疫和病毒学随访。
在93名停止包含齐多夫定的一线治疗的患者和72名停止包含司他夫定的一线治疗的患者中,分别有67名(72%)和54名(75%)可进行基因型耐药检测。齐多夫定组中TAMs的存在明显比司他夫定组更频繁(23.8%对5.5%;P = 0.006)。尽管病毒耐药的基线情况不同(治疗1年时CD4细胞/mm³的中位数增加,分别为118和119;病毒载量<400拷贝/mL,分别为47%和47%),但齐多夫定组和司他夫定组对二线治疗的短期和长期免疫及病毒学反应相当。
这些结果表明,与包含司他夫定的方案相比,接受包含齐多夫定的抗逆转录病毒方案的患者中发生TAMs的更多。尽管观察性研究的结果应谨慎解释,但这些发现可能有助于确定齐多夫定和司他夫定治疗初治HIV-1感染患者的最佳顺序。