Schmid H P, McNeal J E, Redwine E A, Freiha F S, Stamey T A
Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center.
Helv Chir Acta. 1992 Oct;59(3):471-6.
The predictive value of quantitated tumor volume for the prognosis of the individual patient with prostate cancer has been established in analysis of more than 500 radical prostatectomy specimens at Stanford Medical Center. The Stanford technique for detailed tissue sectioning involves considerable time and expense plus computer planimetry. Therefore we have developed two simplified protocols which are suitable to routine diagnostic pathology. Histologic slides of 145 radical prostatectomy specimens, as evaluated by the Stanford technique, were reviewed and a selection of slides was made in a systematic fashion according to two protocols ("bilateral" and "parasagittal"). Tumor volume was estimated manually from this reduced sample of slides by comparing cancer areas to a millimeter grid. The bilateral protocol used an average of 11.7 slides per case (range 8-20), the parasagittal protocol used an average of 8.8 slides per case (range 6-15) versus an average of 26.2 slides per case (range 16-67) by the original Stanford technique. Volume estimates were within +/- 20% of true (computer) volume in 96% and 89% of cases, respectively. A simplified tissue sampling technique can yield accurate cancer volume determinations in radical prostatectomy specimens with reduced time and expense.
在斯坦福医学中心对500多例前列腺癌根治性切除术标本进行的分析中,已证实定量肿瘤体积对前列腺癌个体患者预后的预测价值。斯坦福大学详细组织切片技术耗时且费用高昂,还需要计算机平面测量法。因此,我们开发了两种适用于常规诊断病理学的简化方案。回顾了145例经斯坦福技术评估的前列腺癌根治性切除术标本的组织学切片,并根据两种方案(“双侧”和“矢状旁”)系统地选择了切片。通过将癌灶面积与毫米网格进行比较,从这些减少的切片样本中手动估计肿瘤体积。双侧方案每例平均使用11.7张切片(范围为8 - 20张),矢状旁方案每例平均使用8.8张切片(范围为6 - 15张),而原始斯坦福技术每例平均使用26.2张切片(范围为16 - 67张)。在96%和89%的病例中,体积估计值分别在真实(计算机)体积的±20%范围内。一种简化的组织采样技术可以在减少时间和费用的情况下,准确测定前列腺癌根治性切除术标本中的癌体积。