Marx D A, Slonim A D
Outcome Engineering LLC, Dallas, TX, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii33-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii33.
Since 1 July 2001 the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has required each accredited hospital to conduct at least one proactive risk assessment annually. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was recommended as one tool for conducting this task. This paper examines the limitations of FMEA and introduces a second tool used by the aviation and nuclear industries to examine low frequency, high impact events in complex systems. The adapted tool, known as sociotechnical probabilistic risk assessment (ST-PRA), provides an alternative for proactively identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating patient safety risk. The uniqueness of ST-PRA is its ability to model combinations of equipment failures, human error, at risk behavioral norms, and recovery opportunities through the use of fault trees. While ST-PRA is a complex, high end risk modelling tool, it provides an opportunity to visualize system risk in a manner that is not possible through FMEA.
自2001年7月1日起,医疗保健机构认证联合委员会(JCAHO)要求每家获得认证的医院每年至少进行一次主动风险评估。失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)被推荐为完成这项任务的一种工具。本文探讨了FMEA的局限性,并介绍了航空和核工业用于检查复杂系统中低频、高影响事件的第二种工具。这种经过改编的工具,即社会技术概率风险评估(ST-PRA),为主动识别、确定患者安全风险的优先级并减轻风险提供了一种替代方法。ST-PRA的独特之处在于它能够通过使用故障树对设备故障、人为错误、有风险的行为规范以及恢复机会的组合进行建模。虽然ST-PRA是一种复杂的高端风险建模工具,但它提供了一种以FMEA无法实现的方式可视化系统风险的机会。