• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神卫生服务的预算与融资:来自世界卫生组织项目地图集的89个国家的基线信息。

Budget and financing of mental health services: baseline information on 89 countries from WHO's project atlas.

作者信息

Saxena Shekhar, Sharan Pratap, Saraceno Benedetto

机构信息

Mental Health: Evidence and Research, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organization, CH - 1211, Geneva - 27, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Sep;6(3):135-43.

PMID:14646006
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Very little information is available on budget and financing of mental health services in the world.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

During year 2001, WHO collected information from all countries on resources available for mental health care as a part of Project Atlas. The present report seeks to describe the situation regarding federal budgets and financing of mental health care at the country level. It also examines the association between relative allocation of health budget to mental health and mental health policy, programme and resource indicators in 89 countries.

METHOD

The information was collected through a questionnaire (with an accompanying glossary) that was sent to the mental health focal point in the Ministry of Health of each country. Eighty nine countries provided information on their mental health budget as a proportion of health budget. In addition, information was obtained on policy, programme and mental health resource indicators (beds, personnel, services to special population and availability of drugs).

RESULTS

The results showed that 32% of 191 countries did not have a specified budget for mental health. Of the 89 countries that supplied the requisite information 36% spent less than 1% of their total health budget on mental health. Many countries from Africa (79%) and the South East Asia (63%) were in this subgroup. Comparison with the Global Burden of Disease data showed a marked disparity between burden and resources. Lower income countries allocated a lesser proportion of their health budget on mental health in comparison to higher income countries. The primary method of financing mental health care in most countries was tax-based (60.2%), but many low-income countries depended on out-of-pocket expenditure (16.4%). The presence of mental health policies and programmes in general was not associated with the proportion of health budget allocated to mental health. Counties categorized based on the proportion of mental health budget to health budget, differed significantly in terms of policy on disability benefits and mental health resource indicators (beds, personnel, services for special populations and availability of drugs).

DISCUSSION AND LIMITATIONS

Federal allocation for mental health care in most countries is low compared to the burden of these disorders. There is also a large disparity among countries and regions. Limitations of the study were, an exclusive reliance on government sources and the difficulty some governments faced in providing accurate information on federal mental health budget as it was not identified separately.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE

To use resources more efficiently and judiciously, countries should support integration of services, reallocation of mental health beds, training in mental health to providers and services for special populations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES

Most countries need to increase their mental health budgets in order to provide necessary services. Countries with out-of-pocket payment as the primary method of mental health financing should seek to establish social insurance mechanisms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

More research needs to be conducted to gather specific information on mental health financing in relation to policy and service planning.

摘要

背景

关于世界范围内精神卫生服务的预算和融资情况,可获取的信息非常少。

研究目的

2001年,世界卫生组织从所有国家收集了有关精神卫生保健可用资源的信息,作为《世界精神卫生地图集》项目的一部分。本报告旨在描述国家层面精神卫生保健的联邦预算和融资情况。它还考察了89个国家卫生预算中精神卫生的相对分配与精神卫生政策、项目及资源指标之间的关联。

方法

通过一份问卷(附带术语表)收集信息,问卷发送给每个国家卫生部的精神卫生联络点。89个国家提供了其精神卫生预算占卫生预算比例的信息。此外,还获取了政策、项目及精神卫生资源指标(床位、人员、针对特殊人群的服务以及药品供应情况)的信息。

结果

结果显示,191个国家中有32%没有为精神卫生设立特定预算。在提供所需信息的89个国家中,36%用于精神卫生的支出占其卫生预算总额不到1%。许多非洲国家(79%)和东南亚国家(63%)属于这一类别。与全球疾病负担数据的比较显示,负担与资源之间存在明显差距。与高收入国家相比,低收入国家在精神卫生方面分配的卫生预算比例较低。大多数国家精神卫生保健的主要融资方式是基于税收(60.2%),但许多低收入国家依赖自费支出(16.4%)。总体而言,精神卫生政策和项目的存在与分配给精神卫生的卫生预算比例无关。根据精神卫生预算占卫生预算的比例进行分类的国家,在残疾福利政策和精神卫生资源指标(床位、人员、针对特殊人群的服务以及药品供应情况)方面存在显著差异。

讨论与局限性

与这些疾病的负担相比,大多数国家对精神卫生保健的联邦拨款较低。国家和地区之间也存在很大差距。该研究的局限性在于,完全依赖政府来源,并且一些政府在提供关于联邦精神卫生预算的准确信息时面临困难,因为该预算未单独列出。

对卫生保健提供和使用的启示

为了更有效和明智地利用资源,各国应支持服务整合、重新分配精神卫生床位、对提供者进行精神卫生培训以及为特殊人群提供服务。

对卫生政策的启示

大多数国家需要增加其精神卫生预算,以便提供必要的服务。以自费支付作为精神卫生主要融资方式的国家应寻求建立社会保险机制。

对进一步研究的启示

需要开展更多研究,以收集与政策和服务规划相关的精神卫生融资的具体信息。

相似文献

1
Budget and financing of mental health services: baseline information on 89 countries from WHO's project atlas.精神卫生服务的预算与融资:来自世界卫生组织项目地图集的89个国家的基线信息。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Sep;6(3):135-43.
2
From financial analysis to policy development in mental health care: the need for broader conceptual models and partnerships.从心理健康护理中的财务分析到政策制定:对更广泛概念模型和伙伴关系的需求。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Sep;6(3):149-50.
3
Financing global mental health services and the role of WHO.全球精神卫生服务的融资及世界卫生组织的作用
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Sep;6(3):145-7.
4
Mental health system financing in developing countries: policy questions and research responses.发展中国家的心理健康系统融资:政策问题与研究回应
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Oct-Dec;16(4):282-8.
5
Mental health funds increase slightly in 1994 federal budget.1994年联邦预算中,心理健康基金略有增加。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;44(12):1200.
6
Government financing for health and specific national budget lines: the case of vaccines and immunization.政府对卫生的财政投入及特定国家预算项目:以疫苗和免疫为例
Vaccine. 2008 Dec 2;26(51):6727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.090.
7
[The decrease in the number of psychiatric beds did not mean the reduction in mental health budget in Brazil].
Braz J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;29(2):194-5. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462007000200026.
8
NMHA responds negatively to Clinton mental health budget.全国心理健康协会对克林顿的心理健康预算做出负面回应。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1995 Apr;33(4):47.
9
President's 1999 budget seeks funding increases in most areas except mental health service programs.总统1999年的预算案寻求在除精神健康服务项目外的大多数领域增加资金投入。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Mar;49(3):401.
10
Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe.儿童和青少年精神障碍:全球范围内该问题的严重程度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;49(3):226-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01855.x. Epub 2008 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the mental health services among people with mental disorders: a literature review.探讨精神障碍患者的心理健康服务:文献综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05965-z.
2
Indigenous mental healthcare and human rights abuses in Nigeria: The role of cultural syntonicity and stigmatization.尼日利亚的本土精神保健和侵犯人权行为:文化共鸣和污名化的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;11:1122396. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122396. eCollection 2023.
3
The Correlates of Government Expenditure on Mental Health Services: An Analysis of Data From 78 Countries and Regions.
政府心理健康服务支出的相关因素:对78个国家和地区数据的分析
Cureus. 2022 Aug 22;14(8):e28284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28284. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process.最少和最佳数量的精神科床位:使用德尔菲法的专家共识。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;27(4):1873-1879. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01435-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Educational and Training Interventions Aimed at Healthcare Workers in the Detection and Management of People With Mental Health Conditions in South and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review.针对南亚和东南亚医护人员在精神卫生状况患者检测与管理方面的教育和培训干预措施:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 11;12:741328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.741328. eCollection 2021.
6
Leveraging Systems Science to Promote the Implementation and Sustainability of Mental Health and Psychosocial Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.利用系统科学促进中低收入国家精神卫生和心理社会干预措施的实施和可持续性。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(4):262-277. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000306.
7
Financing of mental health services: an international perspective.心理健康服务的融资:国际视角。
Int Psychiatry. 2004 Oct 1;1(6):3-4. eCollection 2004 Oct.
8
Impact of economic crises on mental health care: a systematic review.经济危机对精神卫生保健的影响:系统评价。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Nov 13;29:e7. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000641.
9
Perceived stigmatization and discrimination of people with mental illness: A survey-based study of the general population in five metropolitan cities in India.对精神疾病患者的感知污名化与歧视:基于印度五个大城市普通人群的调查研究
Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Mar;60(1):24-31. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_406_17.
10
Out-of-pocket health expenditures in patients with bipolar disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: findings from a study in a psychiatry outpatient clinic in Turkey.土耳其一家精神病门诊的研究显示,双相情感障碍、焦虑症、精神分裂症和其他精神病患者的自付医疗支出。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;53(2):151-160. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1465-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.