Suppr超能文献

儿童慢性透析患者及技术存活情况的多中心经验。

A multicenter experience on patient and technique survival in children on chronic dialysis.

作者信息

Verrina Enrico, Edefonti Alberto, Gianoglio Bruno, Rinaldi Stefano, Sorino Palma, Zacchello Graziella, Lavoratti Giancarlo, Maringhini Silvio, Pecoraro Carmine, Calevo Maria Grazia, Turrini Dertenois Laura, Perfumo Francesco

机构信息

Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, G. Gaslini Institute, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16148 Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2004 Jan;19(1):82-90. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1270-6. Epub 2003 Nov 25.

Abstract

In this study we compared patient and technique survival of 163 new hemodialysis (HD) patients (age 11.4+/-3.1 years) and 295 peritoneal dialysis patients (7.7+/-4.8 years. P< 0.001), treated in 23 dialysis centers participating in the Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis (CPD) during the years 1989-2000. Three HD (1.8%) and 17 CPD (5.8%) patients died; the overall average death rate was 9.8/1,000 patient-years in HD and 29.8/1,000 patient-years in CPD patients. No statistically significant difference in patient survival between CPD and HD was found, while the survival of 102 CPD children younger than 5 years at the start of dialysis was lower ( P=0.0001) than that of 193 CPD and 160 HD patients aged 5-15 years. We registered 12 modality failures among HD (7.4%) patients and 44 among CPD (14.9%) patients. The main causes were vascular access failure and patient choice in HD, and infection in CPD patients. Technique survival was lower ( P=0.007) in CPD than in HD patients; a statistically significant difference ( P=0.01) was also observed between both the 0- to 5- and the 5- to 15-year-old CPD patients and the HD patients aged 5-15 years. Logistic regression analysis confirmed age at initiation of dialysis to be a predictor of patient death ( P=0.0001) in the whole patient population, and of technique failure in HD ( P=0.006) but not in CPD patients ( P=0.16).

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了1989年至2000年期间在23个参与意大利儿科慢性腹膜透析(CPD)登记处的透析中心接受治疗的163例新血液透析(HD)患者(年龄11.4±3.1岁)和295例腹膜透析患者(7.7±4.8岁,P<0.001)的患者生存率和技术生存率。3例HD患者(1.8%)和17例CPD患者(5.8%)死亡;HD患者的总体平均死亡率为9.8/1000患者年,CPD患者为29.8/1000患者年。CPD和HD患者的生存率在统计学上无显著差异,而透析开始时年龄小于5岁的102例CPD儿童的生存率低于(P=0.0001)193例CPD患者和160例年龄在5至15岁的HD患者。我们记录到HD患者中有12例(7.4%)出现方式失败,CPD患者中有44例(14.9%)出现方式失败。主要原因在HD中是血管通路失败和患者选择,在CPD患者中是感染。CPD患者的技术生存率低于HD患者(P=0.007);在0至5岁和5至15岁的CPD患者与5至15岁的HD患者之间也观察到统计学上的显著差异(P=0.01)。逻辑回归分析证实,透析开始时的年龄是整个患者群体中患者死亡的预测因素(P=0.0001),是HD中技术失败的预测因素(P=0.006),但不是CPD患者技术失败的预测因素(P=0.16)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验