Suppr超能文献

Advia 120血液分析仪在生物体液(脑脊液、腹腔液、胸腔液、心包液、滑膜液等)细胞分类分析中的应用。

Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others).

作者信息

Aulesa C, Mainar I, Prieto M, Cobos N, Galimany R

机构信息

Unidad de Laboratorios, Ciudad Sanitaria Valle de Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Lab Hematol. 2003;9(4):214-24.

Abstract

The centralization of our laboratories and the demand for new parameters to measure have led to an increase in the number of biological fluid samples, which are generally sent for urgent analysis. Due to this they cannot be processed by manual methods. Meeting this increased demand for assistance is a challenge for the laboratory, and the challenge has been met by the automated hematology area. A study of the reliability of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer has been carried out through leukocyte and red blood cell counting of 179 biological fluids: cerebrospinal, peritoneal or ascitic, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others. The automated leukocyte counts of cerebrospinal fluid samples containing up to 0.150 x 10(9) leukocytes/L are correlated with counts obtained with the manual reference method in a Neubauer counting chamber (r = 0.958; P = .0001). Applying Passing-Bablok regression analysis to these results indicates a slope p of 1.155 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.915-1.347) and an ordinate intercept b of 0.0076 (95% CI, 0.012-0.034), showing the results to be perfectly interchangeable. In the comparison of the manual analysis of the leukocyte differential using the May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining method with the analysis using the automated method, the percentage of polymorphonuclear granulocytes of the Advia 120 basophil/lobularity method is significantly correlated (r = 0.844; P = .0001) with that obtained with the manual count. The results of Passing-Bablok regression analysis (p = 0.859 [95% CI, 0.58-1.190]; b = 8.8 [95% CI, -12.09-24.2]) indicate that these two counting methods are also perfectly interchangeable. Automated leukocyte and differential counts of peritoneal or ascitic fluids also show good correlations with the manual method, and the results are not statistically different. Pretreating synovial fluid samples with hyaluronidase enzyme allows their processing on the Advia 120; no significant differences were found between manual and automated methods with respect to leukocyte counts and differentials. Finally, results with pleural fluid samples indicated that leukocyte and differential counts obtained with the Advia 120 showed significant differences from results obtained with manual methods because of the high incidence of mesothelial, lymphoid, and other tumoral cells in this kind of fluid sample. This result shows that use of hematology analyzers is questionable for these kinds of samples, especially from oncology patients with tumors. A procedure is proposed for the processing of these pleural fluids.

摘要

我们实验室的集中化以及对新测量参数的需求导致生物体液样本数量增加,这些样本通常被送去进行紧急分析。因此,它们无法用手工方法处理。满足这种对辅助的增加需求对实验室来说是一项挑战,而血液学自动化领域已应对了这一挑战。通过对179份生物体液(脑脊液、腹腔或腹水、胸腔、心包、滑膜液等)进行白细胞和红细胞计数,对Advia 120血液分析仪的可靠性进行了一项研究。含有高达0.150×10⁹白细胞/L的脑脊液样本的自动白细胞计数与在Neubauer计数板中用手工参考方法获得的计数相关(r = 0.958;P = 0.0001)。对这些结果应用Passing - Bablok回归分析表明斜率p为1.155(95%置信区间[CI],0.915 - 1.347),截距b为0.0076(95% CI,0.012 - 0.034),表明结果完全可互换。在将使用May - Grünwald - Giemsa染色法进行白细胞分类的手工分析与自动方法分析进行比较时,Advia 120嗜碱性粒细胞/分叶法的多形核粒细胞百分比与手工计数获得的结果显著相关(r = 0.844;P = 0.0001)。Passing - Bablok回归分析的结果(p = 0.859 [95% CI,0.58 - 1.190];b = 8.8 [95% CI, - 12.09 - 24.2])表明这两种计数方法也完全可互换。腹腔或腹水的自动白细胞和分类计数也与手工方法显示出良好的相关性,结果在统计学上无差异。用透明质酸酶预处理滑膜液样本可使其在Advia 120上进行处理;在白细胞计数和分类方面,手工方法与自动方法之间未发现显著差异。最后,胸腔积液样本的结果表明,由于这种体液样本中间皮细胞、淋巴细胞和其他肿瘤细胞的高发生率,Advia 120获得的白细胞和分类计数与手工方法获得的结果有显著差异。这一结果表明,对于这类样本,尤其是来自患有肿瘤的肿瘤患者的样本,使用血液分析仪存在疑问。本文提出了一种处理这些胸腔积液的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验