Tongsong Theera, Jitawong Chantip
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Sep;86(9):829-35.
To study the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) in pregnant women with prior cesarean scar who delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.
Prospective descriptive study.
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
One hundred and seventy-seven pregnant women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries, who attended the antenatal clinic and delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between January, 2000 and September, 2002 were recruited with written informed consents.
Systematic non-directive counseling concerning VBAC compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery was given to the pregnant women. Couples freely chose their preferred route of delivery and were informed that they could change their mind at anytime. Subjects attended the high risk antenatal care clinic. Patients who requested repeated cesarean deliveries were scheduled for the operation at 38 weeks of gestation. All VBAC patients were admitted to the labor unit when in labor and were closely monitored. Labor and postpartum information was prospectively recorded.
Success rate of VBAC.
Of 177 counselled women, 118 chose VBAC, 54 chose repeated cesarean and 5 could not make a decision. Thirty-three of the 177 cases were excluded, leaving 98 in the VBAC group and 46 in the repeated cesarean group. Baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups were not significantly different. Nineteen of the 98 cases were delivered by cesarean section because of obstetric indications (12/19) and changed their minds during the antenatal period (7/19). Forty-three of 79 cases had successful vaginal delivery, and 36 underwent repeated cesarean deliveries due to obstetric indications (19/36) and changed their minds during labor (17/36). The success rate of VBAC after trial of labor was 54.4 per cent (43 in 79). No uterine rupture or serious complication occurred in the present study.
The attitude for VBAC was 66.7 per cent and the success rate of VBAC after trial of labor was 54.4 per cent in the present series. Several cesarean deliveries could be avoided by the VBAC policy. Unlike other previous reports, the failure rate of VBAC was rather high. This was associated with many factors such as change of mind due to labor pain.
研究在清迈玛哈拉吉医院分娩的有剖宫产史孕妇的剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)成功率。
前瞻性描述性研究。
泰国清迈的清迈玛哈拉吉医院。
2000年1月至2002年9月期间在清迈玛哈拉吉医院产前门诊就诊并分娩的177例有一或两次剖宫产史的孕妇,均获得书面知情同意后纳入研究。
向孕妇提供关于VBAC与选择性再次剖宫产的系统非指导性咨询。夫妻双方自由选择他们倾向的分娩方式,并被告知他们可以随时改变主意。研究对象参加高危产前保健门诊。要求再次剖宫产的患者在妊娠38周时安排手术。所有VBAC患者在临产时收入产房并进行密切监测。前瞻性记录分娩及产后信息。
VBAC成功率。
在177例接受咨询的女性中,118例选择VBAC,54例选择再次剖宫产,5例无法做出决定。177例中33例被排除,VBAC组剩余98例,再次剖宫产组剩余46例。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。98例中有19例因产科指征行剖宫产(12/19),以及在孕期改变主意(7/19)。79例中有43例成功阴道分娩,36例因产科指征(19/36)及在分娩过程中改变主意(17/36)行再次剖宫产。试产后VBAC成功率为54.4%(79例中有43例)。本研究中未发生子宫破裂或严重并发症。
本系列研究中VBAC的接受率为66.7%,试产后VBAC成功率为54.4%。VBAC策略可避免多次剖宫产。与以往其他报道不同,VBAC的失败率相当高。这与许多因素有关,如因分娩疼痛改变主意。