Thompson Faye E
University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Nov;10(6):588-601. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne649oa.
Practitioners' ethical orientation and responses vary between practice settings. Yet, currently, the ethics for midwifery practice that is explicit in the literature and which provides the ideals of socialization into practice, is that of bio(medical)ethics. Traditional bioethics, developed because of World War II atrocities and increased scientific research, is based on moral philosophy, normative theory, abstract universal principles and objective problem solving, all of which focus on right and wrong 'action' for resolving dilemmas. They exclude context and relationship. Personal narratives of mothers and midwives contest the appropriateness of these accepted values and systems for childbirth because they induce conflict between workplace/service provider ethics and personal/professional midwifery ethics. In contrast to the disembedded and disembodied approach of biomedical ethics, an ethically adequate response in midwifery practice resonates more with the ethics of intimates, such as feminist virtue ethics.
从业者的伦理取向和应对方式因执业环境而异。然而,目前文献中明确阐述的、为助产实践提供社会化理想模式的助产伦理,是生物(医学)伦理。传统生物伦理因二战暴行和科学研究的增加而发展起来,它基于道德哲学、规范理论、抽象的普遍原则和客观的问题解决方法,所有这些都聚焦于解决困境时的正确与错误“行为”。它们排除了背景和关系因素。母亲和助产士的个人叙述对这些被广泛接受的分娩价值观和体系的适用性提出了质疑,因为它们引发了职场/服务提供者伦理与个人/专业助产伦理之间的冲突。与生物医学伦理那种脱离情境和主体的方法不同,助产实践中符合伦理的应对方式与亲密关系伦理(如女权主义美德伦理)更为契合。