Suppr超能文献

肠易激综合征新诊断标准对社区患病率估计的影响。

The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates.

作者信息

Saito Y A, Talley N J, J Melton L, Fett S, Zinsmeister A R, Locke G R

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003 Dec;15(6):687-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00441.x.

Abstract

The 'Rome' criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over 15 years with four published versions. The impact of these changes on community prevalence rates is not known. Study aims were to estimate the prevalence of IBS using the four Rome criteria and agreement between Rome II and previous criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents in 1992. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence estimates were calculated for Rome II (1999), Rome I (1992), Rome (1990), and Rome (1989) criteria. Per cent agreement and kappa values were calculated to assess agreement. Of 892 eligible subjects, 643 (72%) responded. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of IBS was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 7.0], 6.8% (95% CI: 4.7, 8.9), 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2, 7.1) and 27.6% (95% CI: 23.6, 31.5), respectively. In comparison with Rome II criteria, per cent agreement and kappa values were 97.2% and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.88), 96.4% and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.80), and 79.0% and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.40), respectively. Thus, although differences were seen with the older criteria, compared with the Rome I criteria, good agreement was seen and community prevalence estimates were similar with the Rome II criteria.

摘要

肠易激综合征(IBS)的“罗马”标准在15年间已历经四个发布版本不断演变。这些变化对社区患病率的影响尚不清楚。研究目的是使用这四个罗马标准估计IBS的患病率,并评估罗马II标准与先前标准之间的一致性。1992年,调查问卷被邮寄给明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县居民的一个随机样本。计算了罗马II(1999年)、罗马I(1992年)、罗马(1990年)和罗马(1989年)标准的年龄和性别调整患病率估计值。计算百分比一致性和kappa值以评估一致性。在892名符合条件的受试者中,643人(72%)做出了回应。IBS的年龄和性别调整患病率分别为5.1%[95%置信区间(CI):3.1,7.0]、6.8%(95%CI:4.7,8.9)、5.1%(95%CI:3.2,7.1)和27.6%(95%CI:23.6,31.5)。与罗马II标准相比,百分比一致性和kappa值分别为97.2%和0.78(95%CI:0.69,0.88)、96.4%和0.68(95%CI:0.55,0.80)以及79.0%和0.29(95%CI:0.19,0.40)。因此,尽管与旧标准存在差异,但与罗马I标准相比,一致性良好,且罗马II标准的社区患病率估计值相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验