Frongillo Edward A, Chowdhury Nusrat, Ekström Eva-Charlotte, Naved Ruchira T
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
J Nutr. 2003 Dec;133(12):4158-62. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.12.4158.
This research aimed to gain in-depth understanding of the experience of household food insecurity in rural Bangladesh and to develop a direct measure of it from this understanding. Using naturalistic, emergent inquiry, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 rural women living in diverse situations using a semistructured interview guide. Two analytic strategies classified households on food insecurity and elicited themes that were the basis for classification. Survey questions were developed to capture themes, and were revised after review, field testing, and ranking and pile-sorting exercises. Four gradations of severity of food insecurity resulted, based on nine themes: meals, cooking, rice, fish, perishable foods, snacks, festival food, other expenditures and management strategies. The emergent conceptualization of food insecurity differs from that found from naturalistic research in other countries. The developed food insecurity measure has 11 questions. This research affirms the value of gaining in-depth understanding of household food insecurity. In many situations, this approach, rather than translating questions developed elsewhere, may best lead to suitable experience-based measures of food insecurity.
本研究旨在深入了解孟加拉国农村家庭粮食不安全的情况,并基于这一理解制定一种直接衡量方法。采用自然主义的、自发式探究方法,使用半结构化访谈指南对21名生活状况各异的农村妇女进行了深入访谈。两种分析策略对家庭粮食不安全状况进行了分类,并引出了作为分类基础的主题。据此制定了调查问题以捕捉这些主题,并在审查、实地测试以及排序和分类练习后进行了修订。基于九个主题得出了粮食不安全严重程度的四个等级:膳食、烹饪、大米、鱼类、易腐食品、零食、节日食品、其他支出和管理策略。粮食不安全的新出现的概念化与其他国家自然主义研究中的概念化不同。所制定的粮食不安全衡量方法有11个问题。本研究肯定了深入了解家庭粮食不安全状况的价值。在许多情况下,这种方法而非翻译其他地方制定的问题,可能最有助于得出基于经验的合适的粮食不安全衡量方法。