Young Sera L, Frongillo Edward A, Jamaluddine Zeina, Melgar-Quiñonez Hugo, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Ringler Claudia, Rosinger Asher Y
Department of Anthropology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1058-1073. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab003.
Water security is a powerful concept that is still in its early days in the field of nutrition. Given the prevalence and severity of water issues and the many interconnections between water and nutrition, we argue that water security deserves attention commensurate with its importance to human nutrition and health. To this end, we first give a brief introduction to water insecurity and discuss its conceptualization in terms of availability, access, use, and stability. We then lay out the empirical grounding for its assessment. Parallels to the food-security literature are drawn throughout, both because the concepts are analogous and food security is familiar to the nutrition community. Specifically, we review the evolution of scales to measure water and food security and compare select characteristics. We then review the burgeoning evidence for the causes and consequences of water insecurity and conclude with 4 recommendations: 1) collect more water-insecurity data (i.e., on prevalence, causes, consequences, and intervention impacts); 2) collect better data on water insecurity (i.e., measure it concurrently with food security and other nutritional indicators, measure intrahousehold variation, and establish baseline indicators of both water and nutrition before interventions are implemented); 3) consider food and water issues jointly in policy and practice (e.g., establish linkages and possibilities for joint interventions, recognize the environmental footprint of nutritional guidelines, strengthen the nutrition sensitivity of water-management practices, and use experience-based scales for improving governance and regulation across food and water systems); and 4) make findings easily available so that they can be used by the media, community organizations, and other scientists for advocacy and in governance (e.g., tracking progress towards development goals and holding implementers accountable). As recognition of the importance of water security grows, we hope that so too will the prioritization of water in nutrition research, funding, and policy.
水安全是一个强大的概念,在营养领域仍处于起步阶段。鉴于水问题的普遍性和严重性以及水与营养之间的诸多相互联系,我们认为水安全值得得到与其对人类营养和健康的重要性相称的关注。为此,我们首先简要介绍水不安全状况,并从可获得性、获取途径、使用和稳定性方面讨论其概念化。然后,我们阐述其评估的实证基础。在整个过程中,我们将其与粮食安全文献进行类比,这既是因为概念相似,也是因为营养学界对粮食安全更为熟悉。具体而言,我们回顾衡量水安全和粮食安全的尺度的演变,并比较选定的特征。然后,我们回顾关于水不安全的原因和后果的新出现的证据,并以4条建议作为结论:1)收集更多关于水不安全的数据(即关于发生率、原因、后果和干预影响的数据);2)收集关于水不安全的更好的数据(即与粮食安全和其他营养指标同时进行测量,测量家庭内部差异,并在实施干预措施之前建立水和营养的基线指标);3)在政策和实践中联合考虑粮食和水问题(例如,建立联合干预的联系和可能性,认识营养指南的环境足迹,加强水管理实践的营养敏感性,并使用基于经验的尺度来改善粮食和水系统的治理和监管);4)使研究结果易于获取,以便媒体、社区组织和其他科学家能够将其用于宣传和治理(例如,跟踪实现发展目标的进展情况并让实施者承担责任)。随着对水安全重要性的认识不断提高,我们希望在营养研究、资金投入和政策制定中对水的优先重视程度也能随之提高。