George Steven Z, Fritz Julie M, Bialosky Joel E, Donald Douglas A
Center for Pain Research and Treatment, Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida 32610-0165, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2551-60. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096677.84605.A2.
A randomized clinical trial with 4-week and 6-month follow-up periods.
To compare the effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention with standard care physical therapy for patients with acute low back pain.
The disability reduction strategy of secondary prevention involves providing specific treatment for patients that are likely to have chronic disability from low back pain. Previous studies have indicated that elevated fear-avoidance beliefs are a precursor to chronic disability from low back pain. However, the effectiveness of physical therapy intervention based on a fear-avoidance model is unknown.
Sixty-six consecutive patients referred to physical therapy with low back pain of less than 8 weeks' duration were randomly assigned to receive fear-avoidance-based physical therapy (n = 34) or standard care physical therapy (n = 32). The intervention period lasted 4 weeks for this study. Disability, pain intensity, and fear-avoidance beliefs measures were recorded before and after treatment. A 6-month follow-up of the same measures was obtained by mail.
An intention-to-treat principle (last value forward) was used for data analyses that tested the primary and secondary hypotheses. The prediction of disability at 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment was significantly improved by considering the interaction between the type of treatment and the initial level of fear-avoidance beliefs. Both groups had significant within group improvements for disability and pain intensity. The fear-avoidance treatment group had a significant improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs, and fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity were significantly lower than the standard care group at 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment.
Patients with elevated fear-avoidance beliefs appeared to have less disability from fear-avoidance-based physical therapy when compared to those receiving standard care physical therapy. Patients with lower fear-avoidance beliefs appeared to have more disability from fear-avoidance-based physical therapy, when compared to those receiving standard care physical therapy. In addition, physical therapy supplemented with fear-avoidance-based principles contributed to a positive shift in fear-avoidance beliefs.
一项为期4周和6个月随访期的随机临床试验。
比较基于恐惧回避的物理治疗干预与标准护理物理治疗对急性下背痛患者的效果。
二级预防的残疾减少策略包括为可能因下背痛导致慢性残疾的患者提供特定治疗。先前的研究表明,恐惧回避信念增强是下背痛导致慢性残疾的先兆。然而,基于恐惧回避模型的物理治疗干预的有效性尚不清楚。
66例连续因下背痛就诊且病程少于8周的患者被随机分配接受基于恐惧回避的物理治疗(n = 34)或标准护理物理治疗(n = 32)。本研究的干预期持续4周。在治疗前后记录残疾、疼痛强度和恐惧回避信念指标。通过邮件对相同指标进行6个月的随访。
采用意向性分析原则(末次值结转)对主要和次要假设进行数据分析。通过考虑治疗类型与初始恐惧回避信念水平之间的相互作用,显著改善了对治疗后4周和6个月残疾情况的预测。两组在残疾和疼痛强度方面均有显著的组内改善。恐惧回避治疗组的恐惧回避信念有显著改善,且在治疗后4周和6个月时,关于体育活动的恐惧回避信念显著低于标准护理组。
与接受标准护理物理治疗的患者相比,恐惧回避信念增强的患者似乎从基于恐惧回避的物理治疗中获得的残疾改善较少。与接受标准护理物理治疗的患者相比,恐惧回避信念较低的患者似乎从基于恐惧回避的物理治疗中获得的残疾改善较多。此外,辅以基于恐惧回避原则的物理治疗有助于恐惧回避信念产生积极转变。