Meshinchi Soheil, Leisenring Wendy M, Carpenter Paul A, Woolfrey Ann E, Sievers Eric L, Radich Jerald P, Sanders Jean E
Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003 Nov;9(11):706-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2003.08.003.
Recurrent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) predicts a dismal prognosis. We sought to determine whether a second HSCT would result in long-term disease-free survival with acceptable toxicity. We evaluated the outcome of a second HSCT with a preparative regimen of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation in pediatric patients with AML who relapsed after an initial HSCT with a busulfan and cyclophosphamide preparative regimen. Twenty-five patients aged 1.1 to 17.2 years (median, 4.1 years) with AML received a second HSCT for recurrent disease. All patients were conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide for the first HSCT and with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation for the second HSCT. Donor sources for the first HSCT were autologous (n = 11) or allogeneic (n = 14), whereas all donors for the second HSCT were allogeneic (12 matched related, 9 mismatched related, and 4 unrelated). Engraftment after the second HSCT occurred in all patients at median of 19.0 days (range, 11-32 days). The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV graft-versus-host disease was 76% after the second HSCT. Three patients died from regimen-related toxicity before day 100, 9 relapsed at a median of 5.4 months (range, 1.8-34.0 months), and 12 survived a median of 9.1 years (range, 7.0-14.4 years) after the second HSCT. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 100 days, 1 year, and 10 years were 88%, 56%, and 48%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate at 10 years was 44%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that patients who received a second HSCT in relapse had a relative risk of relapse of 7.8 (P =.02) compared with patients who underwent transplantation in remission. In addition, patients who received their second HSCT </=6 months after the first transplantation were at increased risk of relapse (P =.03). These data suggest that second HSCT after a failed initial transplantation results in long-term disease-free survival in one half of children with relapsed AML. Because a higher tumor burden at the time of second HSCT was associated with a higher risk of subsequent relapse, patients might benefit from reinduction therapy before the second HSCT.
造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后复发的急性髓系白血病(AML)预后不佳。我们试图确定第二次HSCT是否能带来可接受毒性的长期无病生存。我们评估了在接受白消安和环磷酰胺预处理方案的初次HSCT后复发的AML患儿中,采用环磷酰胺和全身照射预处理方案进行第二次HSCT的结果。25例年龄在1.1至17.2岁(中位年龄4.1岁)的AML患者因疾病复发接受了第二次HSCT。所有患者第一次HSCT采用白消安和环磷酰胺预处理,第二次HSCT采用环磷酰胺和全身照射预处理。第一次HSCT的供体来源为自体(n = 11)或异体(n = 14),而第二次HSCT的所有供体均为异体(12例匹配相关,9例不匹配相关,4例无关)。第二次HSCT后所有患者均在中位时间19.0天(范围11 - 32天)实现植入。第二次HSCT后II至IV级移植物抗宿主病的累积发生率为76%。3例患者在第100天前死于与方案相关的毒性,9例在中位时间5.4个月(范围1.8 - 34.0个月)复发,12例在第二次HSCT后中位生存9.1年(范围7.0 - 14.4年)。100天、1年和10年的Kaplan-Meier生存估计分别为88%、56%和48%。1年无病生存率为44%。多因素Cox回归分析表明,复发时接受第二次HSCT的患者与缓解期接受移植的患者相比,复发的相对风险为7.8(P = 0.02)。此外,在第一次移植后≤6个月接受第二次HSCT的患者复发风险增加(P = 0.03)。这些数据表明,初次移植失败后进行第二次HSCT可使一半复发AML儿童实现长期无病生存。由于第二次HSCT时较高的肿瘤负荷与随后复发的较高风险相关,患者可能从第二次HSCT前的再诱导治疗中获益。