Suppr超能文献

克罗地亚对德国小蠊(德国小蠊)的暴露水平和皮肤反应性。

Exposure levels and skin reactivity to German cockroach (Blattella germanica) in Croatia.

作者信息

Macan Jelena, Plavec Davor, Kanceljak Bozica, Milkovic-Kraus Sanja

机构信息

Jelena Macan, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska cesta 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2003 Dec;44(6):756-60.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergen levels in house dust and skin reactivity to German cockroach in adult atopic and non-atopic subjects in inland areas of Croatia.

METHODS

Blattella germanica group 2 (Bla g 2) allergen was measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on test strips (Dustscreen(TM) test, Heska AG, Switzerland) in 94 house dust samples collected from living room and bedroom floors, 35 from rural and 59 from urban areas. Skin prick testing with common inhalatory allergens, Blatella germanica, storage mites Lepidoglyphus destructor and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (ALK-Abello, Denmark) was performed in 187 adult outpatients, 131 from urban and 56 from rural areas. Total serum IgE levels were measured using the ELISA method. Subjects with relevant respiratory and/or skin symptoms, at least one positive skin prick test, and/or increased total IgE were considered atopic.

RESULTS

Positive skin prick test to cockroach was observed in 18/187 subjects (9.6%). The frequency of skin prick test positive subjects to cockroach was higher in atopic than in non-atopic subjects, but not significantly (12.2% vs. 4.7%; p=0.098). Of 15 atopic subjects with positive skin prick test to cockroach, 14 also had positive skin prick test to storage mites, 8 to house dust mites, 1 to pollens, and none to cockroach only. Positive skin prick test to storage mites was the only factor which significantly increased the risk for having positive skin prick test to cockroach (n=187; odds ratio, 109.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.06- 5853.5; p= 0.020). In all 94 house dust samples, Bla g 2 was not detectable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that there is no relevant exposure to cockroach allergen in house dust samples from inland areas of Croatia. Consequently, positive skin prick test to cockroach is rare in adult subjects, even in atopics. Positive skin prick test to cockroach in atopics is in the majority of cases related to positive skin prick test to storage mites, probably due to cross-reactivity.

摘要

目的

评估克罗地亚内陆地区成年特应性和非特应性受试者室内灰尘中德国小蠊(Blattella germanica)过敏原水平以及对德国小蠊的皮肤反应性。

方法

使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法在试纸条(Dustscreen™检测,瑞士Heska AG公司)上检测94份从客厅和卧室地板采集的室内灰尘样本中的德国小蠊第2组(Bla g 2)过敏原,其中35份来自农村地区,59份来自城市地区。对187名成年门诊患者进行常见吸入性过敏原、德国小蠊、仓储螨嗜卷书虱(Lepidoglyphus destructor)和腐食酪螨(Tyrophagus putrescentiae)(丹麦ALK - Abello公司)的皮肤点刺试验,其中131名来自城市地区,56名来自农村地区。采用ELISA法检测血清总IgE水平。有相关呼吸道和/或皮肤症状、至少一项皮肤点刺试验阳性和/或总IgE升高的受试者被视为特应性。

结果

187名受试者中有18名(9.6%)对蟑螂的皮肤点刺试验呈阳性。特应性受试者中对蟑螂皮肤点刺试验阳性的频率高于非特应性受试者,但差异无统计学意义(12.2%对4.7%;p = 0.098)。在15名对蟑螂皮肤点刺试验阳性的特应性受试者中,14名对仓储螨的皮肤点刺试验也呈阳性,8名对屋尘螨呈阳性,1名对花粉呈阳性,没有仅对蟑螂呈阳性的。对仓储螨的皮肤点刺试验阳性是唯一显著增加对蟑螂皮肤点刺试验阳性风险的因素(n = 187;比值比,109.82;95%置信区间,2.06 - 5853.5;p = 0.020)。在所有94份室内灰尘样本中,未检测到Bla g 2。

结论

我们的结果表明,克罗地亚内陆地区的室内灰尘样本中不存在与德国小蠊过敏原的相关接触。因此,成年受试者中对蟑螂的皮肤点刺试验阳性很少见,即使在特应性受试者中也是如此。特应性受试者中对蟑螂的皮肤点刺试验阳性在大多数情况下与对仓储螨的皮肤点刺试验阳性有关,可能是由于交叉反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验