Meek R M D, Greidanus N V, McGraw R W, Masri B A
Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Nov;85(8):1120-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b8.14214.
Revision of a total knee arthroplasty may require an extensile approach to permit a satisfactory exposure without compromising the attachment of the patellar tendon. It has been assumed that a rectus snip is a relatively benign form of release, but the effect of using this approach on function, pain and patient satisfaction is not known. From January 1997 to December 1999, 107 patients who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty were followed up at a minimum of two years (mean 40.5 months) and assessed by the Oxford Hip Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Short-Form (SF)-12 and patient satisfaction. Co-morbidity, surgical exposure, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores and the range of movement were also used. A standard medial parapatellar approach was used in 57 patients and the rectus snip in 50. The two groups were equivalent for age, sex and co-morbidity scores. The WOMAC function, pain, stiffness and satisfaction scores demonstrated no statistical difference. The use of a rectus snip as an extensile procedure has no effect on outcome.
全膝关节置换翻修术可能需要采用广泛显露的方法,以在不影响髌腱附着的情况下实现满意的显露。一直以来,人们认为股直肌剪断术是一种相对良性的松解方式,但这种方法对功能、疼痛和患者满意度的影响尚不清楚。1997年1月至1999年12月,对107例行全膝关节置换翻修术的患者进行了至少两年(平均40.5个月)的随访,并采用牛津髋关节评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、简短健康调查量表(SF-12)以及患者满意度进行评估。同时还考虑了合并症、手术显露情况、特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分以及活动范围。57例患者采用标准的髌旁内侧入路,50例采用股直肌剪断术。两组在年龄、性别和合并症评分方面相当。WOMAC功能、疼痛、僵硬和满意度评分无统计学差异。使用股直肌剪断术作为广泛显露手术对结果无影响。