Lim J B T, Chong H C, Pang H N, Tay K J D, Chia S L, Lo N N, Yeo S J
Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, S169608, Republic of Singapore.
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1329-1334. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0034.R1.
Little is known about the relative outcomes of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of revision surgery for the two procedures in terms of complications, re-revision and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a minimum of two years follow-up.
This study was a retrospective review of data from an institutional arthroplasty registry for cases performed between 2001 and 2014. A total of 292 patients were identified, of which 217 had a revision of HTO to TKA, and 75 had revision of UKA to TKA. While mean follow-up was longer for the HTO group compared with the UKA group, patient demographics (age, body mass index and Charlson co-morbidity index) and PROMs (Short Form-36, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, both objective and functional) were similar in the two groups prior to revision surgery. Outcomes included the rate of complications and re-operation, PROMS and patient-reported satisfaction at six months and two years post-operatively. We also compared the duration of surgery and the need for revision implants in the two groups.
At two-year follow-up, both groups of patients had made significant improvement in terms of PROMs compared with pre-operative scores. PROMs and satisfaction rates were similar in the two groups. Complications requiring re-operation were significantly more frequent in the HTO group whilst more revision implants were used in the UKA group, resulting in a longer operative duration.
Revision of HTO and UKA achieve similar post-operative PROMs and satisfaction. Revision of UKA more frequently requires revision components with increased operation duration but fewer complications requiring re-operation compared with revision of HTO. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:1329-34.
关于单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)和高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)翻修为全膝关节置换术(TKA)的相对疗效,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是在至少两年的随访期内,比较这两种手术翻修的并发症、再次翻修情况以及患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。
本研究是对2001年至2014年间在机构关节置换登记处进行的病例数据的回顾性分析。共确定了292例患者,其中217例为HTO翻修为TKA,75例为UKA翻修为TKA。虽然HTO组的平均随访时间比UKA组长,但在翻修手术前,两组患者的人口统计学特征(年龄、体重指数和查尔森合并症指数)以及PROMs(简明健康状况调查量表-36、牛津膝关节评分、膝关节协会评分,包括客观评分和功能评分)相似。结局指标包括并发症发生率、再次手术率、PROMs以及术后6个月和2年时患者报告的满意度。我们还比较了两组的手术时间和翻修植入物的需求情况。
在两年的随访中,与术前评分相比,两组患者的PROMs均有显著改善。两组的PROMs和满意度相似。HTO组需要再次手术的并发症明显更频繁,而UKA组使用了更多的翻修植入物,导致手术时间更长。
HTO和UKA翻修术后的PROMs和满意度相似。与HTO翻修相比,UKA翻修更常需要翻修部件,手术时间增加,但需要再次手术的并发症较少。引用本文:2017;99-B:1329-34。