Suppr超能文献

膝关节翻修术后患者报告结局测量:使用 COSMIN 清单评估 PROM 工具的使用情况和测量特性的综述。

Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e046169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046169.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify: (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to evaluate symptoms, health status or quality of life following discretionary revision (or re-revision) knee joint replacement, and (2) validated joint-specific PROMs, their measurement properties and quality of evidence.

DESIGN

(1) Scoping review; (2) systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 1 July 2020 using the Oxford PROM filter unlimited by publication date or language.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies reporting on the development, validation or outcome of a joint-specific PROM for revision knee joint replacement were included.

RESULTS

51 studies reported PROM outcomes using eight joint-specific PROMs. 27 out of 51 studies (52.9%) were published within the last 5 years. PROM development was rated 'inadequate' for each of the eight PROMs studied. Validation studies were available for only three joint-specific PROMs: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). 25 out of 27 (92.6%) measurement properties were rated insufficient, indeterminate or not assessed. The quality of supporting evidence was mostly low or very low. Each of the validated PROMs was rated 'B' (potential for recommendation but require further evaluation).

CONCLUSION

Joint-specific PROMs are increasingly used to report outcomes following revision knee joint replacement, but these instruments have insufficient evidence for their validity. Future research should be directed toward understanding the measurement properties of these instruments in order to inform clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the outcomes from joint-specific PROMs.

摘要

目的

确定:(1)用于评估非必要(或再次)膝关节置换后症状、健康状况或生活质量的患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs);(2)经过验证的关节特异性 PROMs、其测量特性和证据质量。

设计

(1)范围综述;(2)按照共识基础选择健康状况测量工具(COSMIN)检查表进行的系统综述。

数据来源

从开始到 2020 年 7 月 1 日,使用牛津 PROM 过滤器,通过发布日期或语言对 MEDLINE、Embase、AMED 和 PsycINFO 进行了搜索。

纳入研究的选择标准

纳入报告关节特异性 PROM 用于翻修膝关节置换的开发、验证或结果的研究。

结果

51 项研究报告了使用 8 种关节特异性 PROM 的 PROM 结果。51 项研究中有 27 项(52.9%)发表于过去 5 年内。对研究的 8 种 PROM 中,每种 PROM 的开发均被评为“不足”。仅为 3 种关节特异性 PROM 提供了验证研究:膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、下肢活动量表(LEAS)和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)。27 项中的 25 项(92.6%)测量特性被评为不足、不确定或未评估。支持证据的质量大多为低或极低。每个经过验证的 PROM 都被评为“B”(有推荐的潜力,但需要进一步评估)。

结论

关节特异性 PROMs 越来越多地用于报告膝关节翻修后的结局,但这些工具的有效性证据不足。未来的研究应致力于了解这些工具的测量特性,以便为评估关节特异性 PROMs 结局的临床试验和观察性研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a471/8532560/811c168c53b3/bmjopen-2020-046169f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验