Vlantis A C, Gregor R T, Elliot H, Oudes M
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, South Africa.
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Oct;117(10):815-20. doi: 10.1258/002221503770716278.
This prospective study assessed the advantages and problems associated with converting a patient using an older generation non-indwelling voice prosthesis to a newer generation indwelling voice prosthesis, in this case the Provox2. The voice characteristics of each patient were measured using the old and then the new voice prosthesis. Technical aspects of the insertion of the indwelling prosthesis were noted. Each patient completed a questionnaire after a period of use with the indwelling prosthesis. Changing the prosthesis was simple and uncomplicated in 15 of 17 patients. Acoustic analysis showed improved parameters with the indwelling prosthesis, but no perceptual difference between the two prostheses. The questionnaire revealed that most patients preferred the indwelling prosthesis. Replacing a non-indwelling with an indwelling prosthesis is technically simple, leading to improvement in voice quality and patient satisfaction. It may be reasonable to offer this choice to patients currently using an older generation non-indwelling voice prosthesis.
这项前瞻性研究评估了将使用较旧一代非植入式语音假体的患者转换为新一代植入式语音假体(在本研究中为Provox2)的优点和问题。使用旧的语音假体,然后再使用新的语音假体,测量了每位患者的语音特征。记录了植入式假体插入的技术方面。每位患者在使用植入式假体一段时间后完成了一份问卷。17名患者中有15名更换假体的过程简单且不复杂。声学分析显示,植入式假体的参数有所改善,但两种假体在感知上没有差异。问卷显示,大多数患者更喜欢植入式假体。用植入式假体替换非植入式假体在技术上很简单,可改善语音质量并提高患者满意度。向目前使用较旧一代非植入式语音假体的患者提供这种选择可能是合理的。