[Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].

BACKGROUND

Following total laryngectomy the voice is produced by esophageal speech as well as with voice prostheses by vibrations of pharyngeal mucosal folds. This pharyngeal sound normally has a significantly lower fundamental frequency than the healthy voice (men about 120 Hz, women about 240 Hz, pharyngeal voice about 70 Hz), which is a handicap especially for female laryngectomy patients. In order to improve the postlaryngectomy voice, a new type of voice prostheses containing an integrated sound-producing metallic reed element was developed (ADEVA Company, Lübeck, Germany).

METHODS/PATIENTS: Thirty-five of these new sound-producing voice prostheses were tested in vitro for different prosthesis-specific physical parameters (pressure, flow, sound pressure, flow resistance, frequency range). In 15 voice prosthesis speakers, a sound-producing prosthesis was introduced during a routine outpatient visit. Besides measurement of the above mentioned physical parameters in patients with conventional and sound-producing prostheses, the resulting voice as also evaluated by means of a video recording.

RESULTS

In vitro all prostheses with the metallic reed element produced a clear sound. Flow resistance of the prostheses was slightly elevated by the reed element. Insertion of the prostheses was hindered by the reed element. Period of uninterrupted sound production was prolonged after insertion of a sound-producing prosthesis and patients could speak on a lower pressure level, but the sound of the reed element was permanently distinguishable only in 6 of 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In principle a variation of the pharyngeal voice by means of a sound producing element, which is integrated into a voice prosthesis, is possible. The current design of the metallic reed element tested is not yet suitable for routine clinical use: 1. The reed element is too sensitive and is easily damaged during insertion, so the insertion device has to be improved. 2. The sound producing element is blocked by small amounts of tracheal secretions, so that this element should be replaceable separately without requiring removal of the silicone value (if possible by the patient himself). Prior to insertion of the sound producing voice prosthesis the maximum air flow through the shunt should be measured to determine if the patient can produce the necessary air flow for activation of the reed element. A further improvement for these special types of voice prostheses would be a sound producing element, which generates a variable frequency of sound. Limiting the patient to only one fundamental frequency creates a monotone, which does not sound naturally. Initial progress toward a sound-producing voice prostheses has been made. This should be followed by the necessary improvements in order to improve the feasibility of this design for routine clinical use.