Watson Lea C, Pignone Michael P
Geriatric Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;52(12):956-64.
To determine the accuracy of depression screening instruments for older adults in primary care.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO (search dates 1966 to January 2002), and the Cochrane database on depression, anxiety and neurosis. We also searched the second Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, the 1993 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline on Depression, and recent systematic reviews. Hand-checking of bibliographies and extensive peer review were also used to identify potential articles.
A predefined search strategy targeted only studies of adults aged 65 years or older in primary care or community settings, including long-term care. Articles were included in this review if they reported original data and tested depression screening instruments against a criterion standard, yielding sensitivity and specificity.
Eighteen articles met criteria and are included in this review, representing 9 different screening instruments. The most commonly evaluated were the Geriatric Depression Scale (30- and 15-item versions), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the SelfCARE(D). Differences in the performance of these 3 instruments were minimal; sensitivities ranged from 74% to 100% and specificities ranged from 53% to 98%.
Accurate and feasible screening instruments are available for detecting late-life depression in primary care. More research is needed to determine the accuracy of depression screening instruments for demented individuals, and for those with subthreshold depressive disorders.
确定基层医疗中老年人抑郁筛查工具的准确性。
系统评价。
MEDLINE、PsycINFO(检索日期为1966年至2002年1月)以及关于抑郁、焦虑和神经症的Cochrane数据库。我们还检索了《临床预防服务第二指南》、1993年医疗保健政策与研究机构关于抑郁的临床实践指南以及近期的系统评价。通过手工查阅参考文献和广泛的同行评审来识别潜在的文章。
一个预定义的检索策略仅针对基层医疗或社区环境(包括长期护理)中65岁及以上成年人的研究。如果文章报告了原始数据并根据标准对照测试了抑郁筛查工具,得出敏感性和特异性,则纳入本评价。
18篇文章符合标准并纳入本评价,代表9种不同的筛查工具。评估最多的是老年抑郁量表(30项和15项版本)、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和SelfCARE(D)。这3种工具的性能差异极小;敏感性范围为74%至100%,特异性范围为53%至98%。
有准确且可行的筛查工具可用于在基层医疗中检测老年期抑郁。需要更多研究来确定抑郁筛查工具对痴呆患者以及亚阈值抑郁障碍患者的准确性。