Bonu Sekhar, Rani Manju, Bishai David
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Dec;18(4):370-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czg045.
The study uses data from the Tanzania Human Resources Development Survey (1994) on willingness to pay (WTP) for desired quality of health care at lower-level health facilities to assess potential regressiveness of user fees - a disproportionately higher negative effect of user fees on utilization of health services among the poor compared with the rich. Despite reports of extensive bypassing of the lower-level health facilities in Tanzania, the WTP for quality health care at these health facilities is surprisingly large. WTP was lower among the poor, female and elderly respondents. Almost one-quarter of the poorest 40% of the population was not willing to pay even when the quality of services met their expectations. The results suggest that: the utilization of health services at lower-level health facilities can be increased by improving the quality of care; and the implementation of uniform user charges in the public facilities may be regressive, adversely affecting utilization among the poor, women and the elderly. An effective system of exemptions and waivers will be required for the very poor who may not be able to pay even when quality of services is improved. The findings of the study have policy implications for the Tanzanian government's recent attempts to expand cost-sharing through community health funds at lower-level health facilities, being introduced since 1998.
该研究使用了坦桑尼亚人力资源开发调查(1994年)的数据,以评估使用者付费的潜在累退性——使用者付费对穷人利用卫生服务的负面影响远高于富人,这一影响不成比例。尽管有报告称坦桑尼亚的基层卫生设施被大量绕过,但这些卫生设施提供高质量医疗服务的意愿支付金额却出奇地高。穷人、女性和老年受访者的意愿支付金额较低。最贫困的40%人口中,近四分之一即使在服务质量符合其期望时也不愿支付。结果表明:提高护理质量可以增加基层卫生设施的卫生服务利用率;公共设施实行统一的使用者收费可能具有累退性,对穷人、女性和老年人的利用率产生不利影响。对于那些即使服务质量提高也可能无力支付的赤贫者,将需要一个有效的豁免和减免制度。该研究结果对坦桑尼亚政府自1998年以来通过社区卫生基金在基层卫生设施扩大成本分担的近期尝试具有政策意义。